Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Register  Forgot Password?
  Quick Search:  
Menu
Home
Shop for Scenarios
Article List
Review Section
Advanced Search
Games Wanted (58)
ASL Events
Scenario Lists
Publications
My Page (login req)
Contact
VASL Analyser
About the Archive
Site Sponsors
Stats
   
Scenarios: 6924
Users: 2275
Secret Santas:
Play-list Scenarios: 2974
AARs: 105
Articles: 577
Other files: 15479
Ratings: 17739
Module Reviews: 24
Games Logged: 13994
Scenario Lists: 72
Links: 178
Errata: 810
Map Previews: 3941
Roar games logged: 80464
Total Pubs Owned: 87676
Avg Pubs Owned: 142
Red Tears Shed on Gray ETO (id:#63065)
(Friendly Fire Pack 11 ID:FrF89)
Designer: Peter Struijf and Chris Mazzei
Starter kit scenario?:    Deluxe scenario?:
 
Balance:
RumanianRussian
Overview:
Under German-backed dictator Antonescu, Rumania joined its Nazi ally in the fateful Operation Barbarossa. After two months of defeats, the Soviet Army in the Ukraine was reeling. Second line units, factory militia and ageing equipment were thrown into the path of the Axis invaders. On 17 August, the Rumanian 11th Infantry Division approached the town of Karpova, a key railway junction 30 km northwest of Odessa. The factories and warehouses near the railway station were defended by a ragtag company of Soviet units.
Attacker: Rumanian (Elements of 3rd "Dorobanti" Regiment, 11th Infantry Division and 1st Armored Regiment)
Defender: Russian (Elements of the Odessa Defense Region)  
Turns: 6     Players: 2     OBA: None     Night: No
Karpova, Ukraine 1941-08-18
Unit Counts:
Squads: A:16.0 D:16.0
AFVs: A:3
LT vz 35(g) x 3

D:2
BA-6 x 2

Guns: A:0 D:2
37mm PTP obr. 30 x 1
76.2mm P obr. 00/02P x 1
Victory Conditions:
Exit VP: Building Control VC: Area Control VC:
Unit Based VC: LOS Style VC: CVP Cap:
Misc Rules:
Map Board(s): 1 71
Overlays: O4 X15 X21
Errata (source)
Players wanting to play this game/Request a match:
Scenario Comments
TitleAuthorDate
Latest Updates:
ActionDate
RJenulis Added a playing2018-02-11 23:17:50
aiabx Added a playing2018-02-11 01:05:10
Baldrick Rated the scenario2018-02-10 16:38:01
hoxson1 Modified the Defender's Guns2018-01-05 12:59:29
hoxson1 Modified the Defender's Guns2018-01-05 12:58:14
Last Played:
2018-02-10(D) Andy Beaton vs Richard Hooks Russian winRussian conscripts delayed the Romanian attack on the Russian left flank, allowing reinforcement and further delay. Russian reinforcements arrived after Romanians had captured 2 buildings and Romanians had to try and charge a packed building. A massacre of Romanian troops resulted.
2018-02-10(A) Richard Jenulis vs Andrew Simpson Rumanian win
2017-12-27(A) X von Marwitz vs Alex Koestler Russian winAn early East front scenario that pits the Romanians vs. the Russians. The Romanians have a pretty good force of 16 squads, 4 of which are Assault Engineers which are supported by 3 Czech-built Pz35s. Goodies are 2 DCs and a FT and plenty of MGs. The only thing lacking is leaders of which there are only 3. The Russians have a mostly Consript force which is additionally burdened with an ELR of 2 (which did not have a large impact in our game, though). Only 2 MGs an ATG and an ART piece without AP supported by one Commissar and one leader presage which side is going to be pushed. On the bright side, the Russians defend in good TEM and do receive powerful reinforcements in the form of 4.5 squads, a 9-1 and 2 BA-6 armored trucks. Basically, there are two (or arguably three) ways to tackle this scenario as the Romanians: Concentrate on the western flank or the eastern flank to go all the way or attempt a broad approach to go half the way. It is rather decisive for the Romanians to capture and secure the victory locations in their 4th turn before the Russian reinforcements come in. With their reinforcements, the Russians then need to mount a counterattack, which is one of the attractions of this good scenario design. In our game in which I played the Romanians, I elected to attack down the western flank. There was some indication by the way my opponent had placed one of his rubble counters that he wanted me to do just that, but it appeared the better choice nevertheless. A small force attacked towards the middle-east to tie down some Russians there and to mess up a possible shift of forces towards the west. I did not find the guns nor the HIP unit where I expected them, which helped the middle-east attack to good progress. Instead, I found the Russian strong point the "hard way". Once discovered, I decided to attack it viciously at once and to swamp it immediately, as there is no time for the Romanians to lose a turn. Fortunately, this worked out at some cost (one tank among the losses) and the Russians managed to pull back better than hoped. My Romanians pursued immediately and the two remaining tanks tried to impede the Russians retreating across the streets, one of them dodging the ATG when it popped up. Yet, the Russian Commissar managed to retreat back to the 1H7 building, where he and an accompanying squad met a gruesome death by FT. I had the necessary VC locations captured by the end of Romanian turn 4, though some Russian survivors had unfortunately escaped destruction back in the middle and managed to delay some units there. The 1F6 building and 1H7 area was tightly secured though, when the Russian reinforcements came on. These, I was not quite able to harm when they moved into position. On top of that, my FT went empty on the 3rd shot when the reinforcements closed in. Three defensive fire attacks cowered on the last Russian turn which denied some fire opportunities and RFP to me. This allowed the Russians to close in and reinforce. In the end, it were the few survivors in the back that proved to be my undoing - I could not kill a Russian HS in a 2:1 CC despite Ambush and thus not regain control of a location he had grabbed back to me. And I could not prevent him moving into another one of the back locations because the unit appointed to the task was stuck in melee and the squad covering the approach cowered and could not place a FL with its MG. Altogether a very good and fun game. I can recommend this scenario.
2017-10-23(A) Jeffrey wasserman vs ken young Russian winKen is of course an excellent player and allowed me to pick sides. I picked the attacker figuring it would be easier to attack then defend. As the attacker you have 3 basic ways to get the 10 building hexes needed to win. Left, Right or a combination. Ken setup Strong on his right flank filling the forward most building with conscripts, while setting up his 1st line squads with mgs, supported by some more conscripts on the left. The attackers have several problems, they only have a slight edge initially in squads, there is open ground they must cross to get at the defenders, their squads are 7 moral (6 when broken), their tanks enter the board edge rather then starting with the infantry, and their first line rifle squads are 3 firepower (1 per hs) units. I decided to attack on my left flank opening with a cautious approach (mostly assault moves, covered by the tanks). The problem with this approach was that I only managed to take 2 out of 3 left side buildings before his reinforcements appeared. The alternative on this side was to risk multiple 8 -2 or 4 -2 shots. Maybe next time I will try the right flank!
View all
Links/References
DescriptionUploaded by
(Public) Scenario Lists that contain this scenario:
DescriptionUploaded by
User Files:
FileDescriptionUploaded byViews
(roman-russ.png)Imagehoxson120
(romanian mortar.png)Imagehoxson123
(FrF089 Red Tears Shed On Gray v633 Scenario Archive.jpg)Map Imagevon Marwitz13

Quick Map View:

Images:

 
Statistics:
Avg Rating: 6.00Votes: 6
Views: 0
To-Play list count: 0
Estimated Play time: 5.9 hours
Recorded Games: 4
Archive recorded plays:
Rumanian1
Russian3
Drawn:0

No Roar data found
Login to assign.
Sunday 25 February 2018 06:26:12 PM  (c)dramsey 2018