Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 28 (11 on the archive and 17 on ROAR)
Attacker wins (British/American): 13
Defender wins (German): 15
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
---|
916 | 1058 | 31% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
1131 | 1062 | 60% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
994 | 994 | 50% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
1046 | 1131 | 38% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
984 | 951 | 55% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
951 | 984 | 45% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
1172 | 1142 | 54% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
963 | 994 | 46% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
1084 | 1008 | 61% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
980 | 1097 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
1050 | 995 | 58% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1024.6 vs 1037.8 has a 48.1% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).