Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 13
Attacker wins (British/American): 4
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1091 | 1117 | 46% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1206 | 962 | 80% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1084 | 57% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 1020 | 996 | 53% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1072 | 1133 | 41% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 962 | 989 | 46% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 989 | 962 | 54% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1163 | 1174 | 48% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1151 | 739 | 91% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 963 | 1020 | 42% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1082 | 1078 | 51% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1100 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1059 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (4 wins) average ELOs: 1067.2 vs 1026.3 has a 55.85% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).