Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 12
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1128 | 1067 | 59% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1170 | 977 | 75% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1132 | 1073 | 58% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 897 | 996 | 36% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1086 | 1132 | 43% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1017 | 1166 | 30% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 1166 | 1017 | 70% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1142 | 1122 | 53% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 963 | 897 | 59% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1058 | 53% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1098 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1058 | 995 | 59% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1068.5 vs 1049.8 has a 52.68% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).