Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 13
Attacker wins (British/American): 4
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1064 | 1128 | 41% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1182 | 1027 | 71% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1044 | 63% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 941 | 996 | 42% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1098 | 1133 | 45% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 965 | 990 | 46% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 990 | 965 | 54% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1154 | 1115 | 56% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1152 | 713 | 93% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 963 | 941 | 53% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1060 | 53% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1100 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1057 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (4 wins) average ELOs: 1058.6 vs 1015.4 has a 56.19% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).