Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 12
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 9
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1000 | 1000 | 50% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1000 vs 1000 has a 50% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).