Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 14
Attacker wins (British/American): 5
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1023 | 1110 | 38% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1167 | 938 | 79% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1085 | 57% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 996 | 996 | 50% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1052 | 1133 | 39% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 932 | 989 | 42% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 989 | 932 | 58% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1170 | 1160 | 51% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1140 | 727 | 92% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 1343 | 1178 | 72% | 2012-11-10 | Won |
| 963 | 996 | 45% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1134 | 42% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1101 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1059 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (5 wins) average ELOs: 1073.6 vs 1033.4 has a 55.76% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).