| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.69277801573725 vs Dan Best (823.74327690739) | 985 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49625070945519 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.60532274352) | 953 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49625070945519 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.60532274352) | 953 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.72471331109539 vs Dan Best (784.84758958432) | 971 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.49711252904573 vs Roy Connelly (973.00644262847) | 1003 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.48733545258036 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 972 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.48733545258036 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 972 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.45979177167625 vs David Longstreet (1000) | 943 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.41869852163109 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 916 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.41869852163109 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 916 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.29232413383635 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 897 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.29232413383635 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 897 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.24951663084359 vs Scott Waites (1088.296630007) | 945 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.24951663084359 vs Scott Waites (1088.296630007) | 945 |
| 2013-09-07 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.37889463153035 vs Christopher Brackney (1030.8587324586) | 921 |
| 2013-09-20 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.35741918155506 vs Christopher Brackney (1022.899960546) | 898 |
| 2013-09-27 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 898.12517238048] expected: 0.66341322094041 vs Chris Brackney (1016) | 877 |
| 2013-10-04 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.2464554698424 vs Christopher Brackney (1071.1481841497) | 861 |
| 2013-10-11 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.28584930969757 vs Christopher Brackney (1020.0610850223) | 843 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.2431378411505 vs Scott Waites (1040.265694381) | 827 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.2431378411505 vs Scott Waites (1040.265694381) | 827 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21127929969042 vs Scott Waites (1055.8265162146) | 813 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21127929969042 vs Scott Waites (1055.8265162146) | 813 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18608385161907 vs Scott Waites (1069.3483913948) | 801 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18608385161907 vs Scott Waites (1069.3483913948) | 801 |
| 2014-01-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 801.09063349638] expected: 0.79637010684218 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 788 |
| 2014-01-17 | Rated: 788. expected: 0.21972526084728 vs Christopher Brackney (1008.1470233783) | 838 |
| 2014-01-31 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 837.93758330577] expected: 0.66621932716399 vs Chris Brackney (958) | 881 |
| 2014-02-07 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.45070976685239 vs Christopher Brackney (915.3619630615) | 852 |
| 2014-02-21 | Rated: 852. expected: 0.31922400750977 vs Christopher Brackney (983.56347463948) | 832 |
| 2014-02-22 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 831.56966351937] expected: 0.72959895662552 vs Chris Brackney (1004) | 814 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17675935545745 vs Scott Waites (1081.2577578984) | 867 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17675935545745 vs Scott Waites (1081.2577578984) | 867 |
| 2014-02-28 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.29147010252717 vs Christopher Brackney (1021.305666776) | 848 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26125680070598 vs Scott Waites (1028.5703566477) | 895 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26125680070598 vs Scott Waites (1028.5703566477) | 895 |
| 2014-09-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 895.27956475482] expected: 0.69456841686048 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 876 |
| 2014-09-12 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.31275881464102 vs Christopher Brackney (1012.7598479022) | 856 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32712179553574 vs Scott Waites (981.29079189286) | 899 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32712179553574 vs Scott Waites (981.29079189286) | 899 |
| 2014-10-03 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 899.06420508571] expected: 0.71400343648819 vs Chris Brackney (1058) | 881 |
| 2014-10-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 880.76042502096] expected: 0.75470943570762 vs Chris Brackney (1076) | 865 |
| 2014-10-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 865.06182890624] expected: 0.78690360327315 vs Chris Brackney (1092) | 851 |
| 2014-10-17 | Rated: 851. expected: 0.18757952672222 vs Christopher Brackney (1105.6381693905) | 839 |
| 2014-10-24 | Rated: 839. expected: 0.16742336650803 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.6432591007) | 828 |
| 2014-10-24 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 828.28490454349] expected: 0.84881009403905 vs Chris Brackney (1128) | 819 |
| 2014-11-07 | Rated: 819. expected: 0.17169350879887 vs Christopher Brackney (1092.3748754701) | 808 |
| 2014-11-14 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 808.01161543687] expected: 0.84528506648709 vs Chris Brackney (1103) | 798 |
| 2014-11-21 | Rated: 798. expected: 0.12432195613916 vs Christopher Brackney (1137.1186502988) | 790 |
| 2014-12-05 | Rated: 790. expected: 0.1146623398034 vs Christopher Brackney (1145.0752554917) | 847 |
| 2014-12-12 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.19945746644585 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.4136452392) | 898 |
| 2014-12-19 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 898.23472214747] expected: 0.68971712118214 vs Chris Brackney (1037) | 878 |
| 2014-12-19 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.263163596712 vs Christopher Brackney (1056.8581042443) | 861 |
| 2015-01-09 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.22716254498742 vs Christopher Brackney (1073.7005744339) | 846 |
| 2015-01-16 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.19869993853665 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.2389773131) | 833 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35303318869514 vs Scott Waites (938.22658680715) | 874 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35303318869514 vs Scott Waites (938.22658680715) | 874 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.22461544548494 vs Robert Zinselmeyer (1089.2310115506) | 924 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.37176845022752 vs Rick Salisbury (1015.138884741) | 900 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.31007744619469 vs Rick Salisbury (1038.9320655555) | 880 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-04-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 922.63292317332] expected: 0.73628793835146 vs Chris Brackney (1101) | 906 |
| 2015-05-01 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.22799534869034 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.8775719455) | 891 |
| 2015-05-01 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 891.40829768382] expected: 0.79978596329071 vs Chris Brackney (1132) | 879 |
| 2015-05-08 | Rated: 879. expected: 0.17797223039838 vs Christopher Brackney (1144.8136983494) | 868 |
| 2015-05-30 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.15989156163167 vs Christopher Brackney (1156.2039210949) | 858 |
| 2015-05-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 857.76694005557] expected: 0.85499558593506 vs Chris Brackney (1166) | 848 |
| 2015-06-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 848.48665755542] expected: 0.86756079584188 vs Chris Brackney (1175) | 840 |
| 2015-06-05 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.12161684333589 vs Christopher Brackney (1183.4761090661) | 832 |
| 2015-06-25 | Rated: 832. expected: 0.29439510900917 vs Jim Ferrell (983.85239680528) | 813 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38165941228975 vs Scott Waites (896.82071088364) | 853 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38165941228975 vs Scott Waites (896.82071088364) | 853 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49388850489081 vs Scott Waites (857.24691327018) | 885 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49388850489081 vs Scott Waites (857.24691327018) | 885 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58570014823928 vs Scott Waites (824.85577758319) | 848 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58570014823928 vs Scott Waites (824.85577758319) | 848 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47937394823435 vs Scott Waites (862.34058707051) | 881 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47937394823435 vs Scott Waites (862.34058707051) | 881 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54446527647672 vs Scott Waites (829.0205197575) | 857 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54446527647672 vs Scott Waites (829.0205197575) | 857 |
| 2015-10-23 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.19912664116499 vs Christopher Brackney (1098.773791535) | 876 |
| 2015-11-04 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.26985311861091 vs Scott Holst (1048.9131172585) | 923 |
| 2015-11-09 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.38797835084108 vs Scott Holst (1002.1837168496) | 898 |
| 2015-11-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.3224213967404 vs Scott Holst (1027.0143313034) | 877 |
| 2015-12-14 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.25746588175654 vs Scott Holst (1060.998690871) | 893 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58708161286548 vs Scott Waites (831.86629745201) | 855 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58708161286548 vs Scott Waites (831.86629745201) | 855 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.4792318152933 vs Scott Waites (869.4395206754) | 824 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.4792318152933 vs Scott Waites (869.4395206754) | 824 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14787580593568 vs Jim Burris (1112.2423086674) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14787580593568 vs Jim Burris (1112.2423086674) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-19 | Rated: 783. expected: 0.31445543245688 vs Alex Key (918.39063672591) | 827 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39631168509209 vs Scott Waites (900.11035685418) | 866 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39631168509209 vs Scott Waites (900.11035685418) | 866 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50651263074025 vs Scott Waites (861.47430470007) | 898 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50651263074025 vs Scott Waites (861.47430470007) | 898 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59678001246872 vs Scott Waites (829.89111306745) | 860 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59678001246872 vs Scott Waites (829.89111306745) | 860 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.48836680076273 vs Scott Waites (868.08503386544) | 893 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.48836680076273 vs Scott Waites (868.08503386544) | 893 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58222518232892 vs Scott Waites (835.34050911426) | 856 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58222518232892 vs Scott Waites (835.34050911426) | 856 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47612464748235 vs Scott Waites (872.60292078331) | 890 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47612464748235 vs Scott Waites (872.60292078331) | 890 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57276675043289 vs Scott Waites (839.07489822218) | 853 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57276675043289 vs Scott Waites (839.07489822218) | 853 |
| 2016-08-27 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.18763174114875 vs Dan Best (1107.5786549935) | 841 |
| 2016-09-10 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.15802978664982 vs Dan Best (1131.6231095266) | 831 |
| 2016-09-16 | Rated: 831. expected: 0.14322653004903 vs Dan Best (1141.7370158722) | 822 |
| 2016-09-24 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.13086629514941 vs Dan Best (1150.9035137954) | 878 |
| 2016-09-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 877.62455711044] expected: 0.77752717500967 vs Danno (1095) | 927 |
| 2016-10-08 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.27178037459736 vs Dan Best (1098.21771441) | 910 |
| 2016-10-22 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.23440626912152 vs Dan Best (1115.6116583842) | 895 |
| 2016-10-29 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.20484210359012 vs Dan Best (1130.613659608) | 946 |
| 2016-11-19 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.33524994535188 vs Dan Best (1064.9158663903) | 989 |
| 2016-11-25 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.45212118119053 vs Dan Best (1022.3718628928) | 1024 |
| 2016-12-03 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.55260913853885 vs Dan Best (987.30761848902) | 989 |
| 2016-12-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.45168953373369 vs Dan Best (1022.6746033555) | 960 |
| 2016-12-17 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.37117190895825 vs Dan Best (1051.5827335145) | 1000 |
| 2017-01-07 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.57102346181124 vs Dan Best (950.31183502876) | 1027 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.7049056390829 vs Scott Waites (875.73197024988) | 982 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.7049056390829 vs Scott Waites (875.73197024988) | 982 |
| 2017-01-21 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.58430044559983 vs Dan Best (922.85733658468) | 945 |
| 2017-01-28 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.47806388463976 vs Dan Best (960.25256510307) | 978 |
| 2017-02-04 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.57308541616071 vs Dan Best (926.84865372001) | 941 |
| 2017-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.46586777216042 vs Dan Best (964.75444595192) | 975 |
| 2017-02-25 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.64867835427523 vs Dan Best (868.47020090843) | 933 |
| 2017-03-02 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.67399172890577 vs Tom Abromaitis (806.82962064783) | 954 |
| 2017-03-04 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.56300510035157 vs Dan Best (909.98561558204) | 918 |
| 2017-03-04 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 917.9676735775] expected: 0.54025444859409 vs Danno (946) | 889 |
| 2017-03-16 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 888.54395828752] expected: 0.57773304045626 vs Danno (943) | 926 |
| 2017-03-16 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.27129692912428 vs Dave Mareske (1097.6422887251) | 973 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.46122190794283 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 943 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.46122190794283 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 943 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.37800166720931 vs Colman Quill (1029.5182021083) | 983 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.37800166720931 vs Colman Quill (1029.5182021083) | 983 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.46859042173685 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1017 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.46859042173685 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1017 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.55410498542925 vs Francis Biss (979.25622360398) | 982 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.5070301283237 vs Jeff Ital (977.11464455217) | 950 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.54185787986378 vs Scott Waites (920.84593115119) | 947 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.54185787986378 vs Scott Waites (920.84593115119) | 947 |
| 2017-04-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.58935205726294 vs Dan Best (884.23793902839) | 909 |
| 2017-04-15 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.48136277844987 vs Dan Best (921.95647069321) | 878 |
| 2017-04-29 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.42860081045948 vs Dan Best (927.95465284855) | 915 |
| 2017-05-06 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.53393232868463 vs Dan Best (891.38510471796) | 945 |
| 2017-05-13 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.63856115430191 vs Dan Best (846.13293244197) | 904 |
| 2017-06-03 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.47884372249781 vs Dan Best (918.70967001517) | 937 |
| 2017-06-10 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.57377957650968 vs Dan Best (885.35566825503) | 964 |
| 2017-07-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.72512099537603 vs Dan Best (795.49243580265) | 918 |
| 2017-07-08 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.53803935897882 vs Dan Best (891.51637148262) | 948 |
| 2017-07-15 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.62136323585941 vs Dan Best (861.95089045726) | 908 |
| 2017-07-22 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.44459360927039 vs Dan Best (946.65906275562) | 944 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.40674930734167 vs Jeff Ital (1009.5645727649) | 918 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.2183723482693 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.5209083012) | 904 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.2183723482693 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.5209083012) | 904 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.22729071783709 vs Rick Reinesch (1116.5737715956) | 889 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.58258280657377 vs Dan Best (831.08506811952) | 916 |
| 2017-08-05 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.52721344299951 vs Dan Best (897.07145762246) | 882 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.4405238856768 vs Scott Waites (923.52483546247) | 918 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.4405238856768 vs Scott Waites (923.52483546247) | 918 |
| 2017-08-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.40779732658516 vs Dan Best (982.81039571616) | 956 |
| 2017-09-09 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.51595520206793 vs Dan Best (944.90942461761) | 923 |
| 2017-09-16 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39553671779874 vs Dan Best (996.67324784508) | 898 |
| 2017-09-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.42692979357822 vs Dan Best (949.14054677768) | 935 |
| 2017-10-07 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.40700358175231 vs Dan Best (1000.3815356127) | 909 |
| 2017-10-08 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38257920402666 vs Dan Best (992.14395761876) | 949 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58728803303541 vs Scott Waites (887.71836414579) | 911 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58728803303541 vs Scott Waites (887.71836414579) | 911 |
| 2017-10-14 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.40208637996195 vs Dan Best (979.92763365202) | 949 |
| 2017-10-21 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.45651511918477 vs Dan Best (979.29292063771) | 920 |
| 2017-10-28 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.439903986952 vs Dan Best (961.96183324757) | 956 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.54405937288274 vs Scott Waites (925.30479826005) | 921 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.54405937288274 vs Scott Waites (925.30479826005) | 921 |
| 2017-11-04 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.46211469372897 vs Dan Best (947.37596107618) | 891 |
| 2017-11-11 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.49122455227094 vs Dan Best (897.09843186603) | 860 |
| 2017-11-18 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.34547088365866 vs Dan Best (971.00700792239) | 838 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33114616314264 vs Scott Waites (960.12459812455) | 817 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33114616314264 vs Scott Waites (960.12459812455) | 817 |
| 2017-12-02 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.26623454242747 vs Dan Best (993.11714447655) | 800 |
| 2017-12-09 | Rated: 800. expected: 0.22974421345277 vs Dan Best (1010.1561551919) | 785 |
| 2017-12-16 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.2008895507127 vs Dan Best (1024.8597848529) | 772 |
| 2017-12-30 | Rated: 772. expected: 0.29013550136217 vs Dan Best (927.4298336463) | 753 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21176755629502 vs Scott Waites (981.31795256568) | 803 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21176755629502 vs Scott Waites (981.31795256568) | 803 |
| 2018-01-06 | Rated: 803. expected: 0.28806850148253 vs Dan Best (960.17697389175) | 785 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30159767344712 vs Scott Waites (930.87107616856) | 830 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30159767344712 vs Scott Waites (930.87107616856) | 830 |
| 2018-01-13 | Rated: 830. expected: 0.28350705932372 vs Dan Best (991.05921541135) | 876 |
| 2018-01-20 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.238706007884 vs Dave Mareske (1077.4756211159) | 861 |
| 2018-01-27 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.38113930227537 vs Dan Best (945.20366720807) | 837 |
| 2018-02-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.31793298672967 vs Dan Best (969.59658255369) | 817 |
| 2018-02-10 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.26981775944276 vs Dan Best (989.94429370439) | 864 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46813326950784 vs Scott Waites (886.17332726918) | 898 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46813326950784 vs Scott Waites (886.17332726918) | 898 |
| 2018-02-24 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.46707006141394 vs Dan Best (920.91523518748) | 932 |
| 2018-03-03 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.56467259464197 vs Dan Best (886.80771911797) | 896 |
| 2018-03-10 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.46129805910597 vs Dan Best (922.94676517506) | 866 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42039617590501 vs Justin Williamson (921.78899413234) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42039617590501 vs Justin Williamson (921.78899413234) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.53366932598673 vs Dan Best (879.56869672744) | 933 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.34790499556135 vs Burnie Hegdahl (1042.1400833455) | 975 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28539612768668 vs Jim Burris (1134.4469156067) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28539612768668 vs Jim Burris (1134.4469156067) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.43449899482536 vs Mike Bistodeau (1002.7778420535) | 929 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.43449899482536 vs Mike Bistodeau (1002.7778420535) | 929 |
| 2018-03-24 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.46302983771832 vs Dan Best (954.73647043384) | 899 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.56703968216274 vs Scott Waites (852.13385651768) | 863 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.56703968216274 vs Scott Waites (852.13385651768) | 863 |
| 2018-04-07 | Rated: 863. expected: 0.36834063169757 vs Dan Best (956.69332523399) | 903 |
| 2018-04-14 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.480916346159 vs Dan Best (916.26712566263) | 936 |
| 2018-04-21 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.6141005807467 vs Dan Best (855.29384676231) | 961 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.60295160434466 vs Scott Waites (888.42439617609) | 986 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.60295160434466 vs Scott Waites (888.42439617609) | 986 |
| 2018-04-28 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.64851339554805 vs Dan Best (879.59593080782) | 944 |
| 2018-05-05 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55467990388326 vs Dan Best (905.85194500344) | 909 |
| 2018-05-12 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45357660052149 vs Dan Best (941.35145885197) | 944 |
| 2018-06-02 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55392842199232 vs Dan Best (906.38036128534) | 909 |
| 2018-06-09 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45289140962717 vs Dan Best (941.83178029285) | 944 |
| 2018-06-16 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.59944292267301 vs Dan Best (873.96662900051) | 970 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64927751464081 vs Scott Waites (863.01329885415) | 928 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64927751464081 vs Scott Waites (863.01329885415) | 928 |
| 2018-06-23 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.61268479713045 vs Dan Best (848.33097605158) | 953 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56925259568349 vs Scott Waites (904.56705979116) | 981 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56925259568349 vs Scott Waites (904.56705979116) | 981 |
| 2018-07-14 | Rated: 981. expected: 0.25494869878924 vs Dave Mareske (1167.2933511134) | 965 |
| 2018-07-21 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.64703947758854 vs Dan Best (859.7181418488) | 924 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.31229382550754 vs David Ginnard (1061.1358103709) | 904 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.43185740552678 vs Richard Trippeer (951.64679154744) | 940 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.52580853574791 vs Dan Best (922.05044006387) | 970 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.61081003741033 vs Dan Best (891.70218635174) | 931 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32865990690877 vs Craig Walters (1055.0783426206) | 974 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32865990690877 vs Craig Walters (1055.0783426206) | 974 |
| 2018-08-04 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.50608527792245 vs Dan Best (969.77130700755) | 942 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59246730648314 vs Scott Waites (876.99922591491) | 904 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59246730648314 vs Scott Waites (876.99922591491) | 904 |
| 2018-08-11 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.3623777645533 vs Dan Best (1002.1607647946) | 945 |
| 2018-09-08 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.64022933380727 vs Dan Best (844.87607269874) | 904 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48429415060954 vs Scott Waites (914.91713352983) | 873 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48429415060954 vs Scott Waites (914.91713352983) | 873 |
| 2018-10-20 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.48151471299953 vs Dan Best (885.8507500624) | 906 |
| 2018-10-27 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.57615415649234 vs Dan Best (852.66769169437) | 933 |
| 2018-11-03 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.64989564083012 vs Dan Best (825.54155770988) | 891 |
| 2018-11-10 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.53429075675763 vs Dan Best (867.13487872301) | 921 |
| 2018-11-17 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.61813652290766 vs Dan Best (837.3294871555) | 945 |
| 2018-12-01 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.68145902296336 vs Dan Best (812.89022462159) | 965 |
| 2019-01-05 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.7224740462019 vs Dan Best (798.79254143056) | 919 |
| 2019-01-11 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.60487041733965 vs Dan Best (845.03088038748) | 944 |
| 2019-01-12 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.67156749378805 vs Dan Best (819.74258709722) | 901 |
| 2019-01-19 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.5548633765653 vs Dan Best (862.72290669966) | 929 |
| 2019-01-26 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.63309464674978 vs Dan Best (834.23416279984) | 920 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46277867925543 vs Scott Waites (945.91195916884) | 954 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46277867925543 vs Scott Waites (945.91195916884) | 954 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.65484245127567 vs Dan Best (842.75222019182) | 912 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.53926135467607 vs Dan Best (884.66213707346) | 941 |
| 2019-02-08 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.62105985497677 vs Dan Best (855.17486377273) | 901 |
| 2019-02-16 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.50874505378982 vs Dan Best (894.92269449125) | 868 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43768132718396 vs Scott Waites (911.52979464119) | 840 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43768132718396 vs Scott Waites (911.52979464119) | 840 |
| 2019-02-23 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.28760010222409 vs Dan Best (997.57392495896) | 822 |
| 2019-03-01 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.24663495876591 vs Dan Best (1015.9803315013) | 870 |
| 2019-03-02 | Rated: 870. expected: 0.36290437325149 vs Dan Best (967.76496886233) | 911 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18941528319663 vs Scott Martin (1163.5533573668) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18941528319663 vs Scott Martin (1163.5533573668) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.2416110026446 vs Rick Reinesch (1138.7101264293) | 925 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.57242357160082 vs Dan Best (909.31849845839) | 987 |
| 2019-03-30 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.64672985985676 vs Dan Best (881.95360704085) | 1010 |
| 2019-04-06 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.70417187049305 vs Dan Best (859.34431807168) | 965 |
| 2019-04-13 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.58632084980885 vs Dan Best (904.41131778323) | 991 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.57351808691232 vs Scott Waites (939.54139958096) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.57351808691232 vs Scott Waites (939.54139958096) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-27 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.64946337347326 vs Dan Best (910.87149550924) | 1040 |
| 2019-05-04 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.71828396744377 vs Dan Best (877.40615629025) | 1058 |
| 2019-05-11 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.75829779236435 vs Dan Best (859.37633020666) | 1009 |
| 2019-05-18 | Rated: 1009. expected: 0.68503005760104 vs Dan Best (874.0237932911) | 965 |
| 2019-06-01 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.56741858955647 vs Dan Best (917.86571697756) | 929 |
| 2019-06-08 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.46382565305157 vs Dan Best (954.18050670918) | 899 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48094590358413 vs Scott Waites (912.24655714335) | 932 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48094590358413 vs Scott Waites (912.24655714335) | 932 |
| 2019-06-29 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.4926300201062 vs Dan Best (937.12155749502) | 900 |
| 2019-07-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.47398913143709 vs Dan Best (918.09053372814) | 934 |
| 2019-07-13 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.57086270102505 vs Dan Best (884.42583814011) | 961 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61582720462074 vs Scott Waites (879.02709497273) | 986 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61582720462074 vs Scott Waites (879.02709497273) | 986 |
| 2019-07-20 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.21075249545402 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1215.3761966945) | 973 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.60506521600885 vs Dan Best (898.88927964048) | 934 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.49480000993665 vs Dan Best (937.61345346504) | 966 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.48297639356419 vs Peter Ward (977.83378737939) | 935 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41545244117435 vs Richard Burton (994.31941438395) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41545244117435 vs Richard Burton (994.31941438395) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-08-03 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.64292084043152 vs Dan Best (841.84280007483) | 903 |
| 2019-08-10 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.52876528917782 vs Dan Best (882.98973386244) | 933 |
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.66540457333216 vs Dan Best (813.57368766816) | 954 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31742115558356 vs Paul Lauger (1087.006782168) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31742115558356 vs Paul Lauger (1087.006782168) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.3980740826138 vs Mark Harms (1005.831656166) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.3980740826138 vs Mark Harms (1005.831656166) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38348855192295 vs Jeff Kouba (991.47549670199) | 948 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38348855192295 vs Jeff Kouba (991.47549670199) | 948 |
| 2019-09-07 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.20966775006933 vs Dan Best, Paul Works, Dave Mareske (1178.5112276346) | 935 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61390113415811 vs Scott Waites (854.44003606846) | 896 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61390113415811 vs Scott Waites (854.44003606846) | 896 |
| 2019-09-14 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.52436494341208 vs Dan Best (879.05608304995) | 926 |
| 2019-09-21 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.60955958633461 vs Dan Best (848.61543942833) | 951 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58168012637175 vs Scott Waites (893.72970865458) | 914 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58168012637175 vs Scott Waites (893.72970865458) | 914 |
| 2019-10-05 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.5775304552069 vs Dan Best (859.68820629013) | 877 |
| 2019-10-18 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.5040032944619 vs Dan Best (874.21816664463) | 845 |
| 2019-10-26 | Rated: 845. expected: 0.41244306910271 vs Dan Best (906.47437749019) | 883 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43141899056954 vs Scott Waites (930.95723674237) | 919 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43141899056954 vs Scott Waites (930.95723674237) | 919 |
| 2019-11-02 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.57164533638318 vs Dan Best (868.87073391276) | 882 |
| 2019-11-16 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.40828226703764 vs Dan Best (946.46162683918) | 920 |
| 2019-11-23 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.5164119770953 vs Dan Best (908.59169192959) | 919 |
| 2019-12-07 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.51346390475324 vs Dan Best (909.64205846369) | 886 |
| 2019-12-14 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.41939396389705 vs Dan Best (942.50374836789) | 923 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2020-01-04 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.6330320838574 vs Dan Best (867.28094954854) | 921 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53796541417685 vs Scott Waites (894.56805213882) | 887 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53796541417685 vs Scott Waites (894.56805213882) | 887 |
| 2020-01-11 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.47010926978329 vs Dan Best (907.79500291542) | 889 |
| 2020-01-18 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.47572395690462 vs Dan Best (905.88199618155) | 923 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49136927369004 vs Scott Waites (928.99783864614) | 956 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49136927369004 vs Scott Waites (928.99783864614) | 956 |
| 2020-02-01 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.62758576901422 vs Dan Best (865.34127246439) | 916 |
| 2020-02-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.51509639400714 vs Dan Best (905.5067616813) | 883 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48066006384749 vs Scott Waites (896.4454721623) | 916 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48066006384749 vs Scott Waites (896.4454721623) | 916 |
| 2020-02-15 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.46770388030204 vs Dan Best (938.47293089776) | 886 |
| 2020-02-22 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.38358316766863 vs Dan Best (968.40597923709) | 861 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49682288368392 vs Scott Waites (863.20771624854) | 893 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49682288368392 vs Scott Waites (863.20771624854) | 893 |
| 2020-02-29 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.35999428015813 vs Dan Best (992.95530196788) | 934 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64402807248214 vs Scott Waites (831.00438080431) | 957 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64402807248214 vs Scott Waites (831.00438080431) | 957 |
| 2020-03-07 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.53311025576768 vs Dan Best (933.95891874662) | 987 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73674678088044 vs Scott Waites (808.22217744317) | 940 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73674678088044 vs Scott Waites (808.22217744317) | 940 |
| 2020-03-14 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.56112606599575 vs Dan Best (897.31173765736) | 968 |
| 2020-03-20 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.63844041144325 vs Dan Best (869.22380588109) | 927 |
| 2020-03-21 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.52432487411515 vs Dan Best (910.08399221346) | 957 |
| 2020-03-25 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.14140448794255 vs Dave Mareske (1270.3301682391) | 1012 |
| 2020-03-28 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.68177063515478 vs Dan Best (879.64078415682) | 1032 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73433732931855 vs Scott Waites (855.37397141952) | 985 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73433732931855 vs Scott Waites (855.37397141952) | 985 |
| 2020-04-04 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.67342927321133 vs Dan Best (859.27410480673) | 942 |
| 2020-04-08 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.55678100973725 vs Dan Best (902.37357829226) | 970 |
| 2020-04-09 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.63473324150581 vs Dan Best (874.00756291544) | 993 |
| 2020-04-10 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.69413970023311 vs Dan Best (850.63049037181) | 949 |
| 2020-04-11 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.5770145984372 vs Dan Best (895.05543118673) | 976 |
| 2020-04-18 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.59177645918218 vs Dan Best (911.49614414776) | 938 |
| 2020-04-23 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.41268135826308 vs Dan Best (999.30357379114) | 976 |
| 2020-04-25 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.29818702844886 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1124.6930575479) | 957 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.51709526107532 vs Dan Best (945.11636384845) | 988 |
| 2020-05-02 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.60462332287801 vs Dan Best (914.21046055727) | 949 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.53016418985433 vs Dan Best (928.01429005842) | 915 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.5181657861636 vs Scott Waites (902.3715604959) | 946 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.5181657861636 vs Scott Waites (902.3715604959) | 946 |
| 2020-05-09 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.47706968680548 vs Dan Best (961.9447982091) | 979 |
| 2020-05-14 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.58592192454337 vs Dan Best (918.69699481079) | 1006 |
| 2020-05-16 | Rated: 1006. expected: 0.65816072555551 vs Dan Best (892.19599798157) | 996 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.6516284565174 vs Dan Best (887.21705243134) | 1018 |
| 2020-05-22 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.1737253211535 vs Dave Mareske (1288.9045283291) | 1007 |
| 2020-05-23 | Rated: 1007. expected: 0.69378420304488 vs Dan Best (864.92127364845) | 963 |
| 2020-05-25 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.58480638426305 vs Dan Best (903.49542472184) | 926 |
| 2020-05-29 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.51699525607906 vs Dan Best (914.18593529092) | 893 |
| 2020-05-30 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.43167710066661 vs Dan Best (940.77445770351) | 865 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49059768081103 vs Scott Waites (871.53417081037) | 898 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49059768081103 vs Scott Waites (871.53417081037) | 898 |
| 2020-06-06 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.067675659596057 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1353.653810124) | 894 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.5785916044902 vs Scott Waites (838.93242238228) | 857 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.5785916044902 vs Scott Waites (838.93242238228) | 857 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.24798708328834 vs Dan Best (1049.7184958093) | 905 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.36447005145887 vs Dan Best (1001.5896691397) | 882 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.50868809568326 vs Scott Waites (875.96228506965) | 913 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.50868809568326 vs Scott Waites (875.96228506965) | 913 |
| 2020-06-21 | Rated: 913. expected: 0.34428896931594 vs Dan Best (1024.9157524331) | 891 |
| 2020-06-26 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.30291431162165 vs Dan Best (1035.7865495186) | 936 |
| 2020-06-27 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.42126034405192 vs Dan Best (991.17306546234) | 909 |
| 2020-07-01 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.35979205919482 vs Dan Best (1009.1077930409) | 950 |
| 2020-07-03 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.39329082890614 vs Dan Best (1025.3066962278) | 989 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.69671498175967 vs Scott Waites (844.51832319338) | 944 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.69671498175967 vs Scott Waites (844.51832319338) | 944 |
| 2020-07-11 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.46920866853417 vs Dan Best (965.4231178479) | 978 |
| 2020-07-17 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.60529790114523 vs Dan Best (903.7201071125) | 939 |
| 2020-07-18 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.51222331307704 vs Dan Best (930.50467948418) | 906 |
| 2020-07-24 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.4286814114293 vs Dan Best (955.89748106237) | 943 |
| 2020-07-25 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.5502920155377 vs Dan Best (907.93495478985) | 908 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.52716089207715 vs Scott Waites (889.108082026) | 874 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.52716089207715 vs Scott Waites (889.108082026) | 874 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.43244213062498 vs Dan Best (921.23286050179) | 846 |
| 2020-08-07 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.29380111189531 vs Dan Best (998.34943775515) | 827 |
| 2020-08-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.25075174667196 vs Dan Best (1017.1527089164) | 811 |