User: grumblejones
| Name: | Kermit Mullins |
| Registered on: | 2010-03-13 03:41:55 |
| Last Login: | 2021-06-20 00:21:27 |
User Notes:
Owns: 2761 Scenarios
Played: 496 (450 unique scenarios: 16%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 982 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.71620505063523 vs Dan Best (804.18691313722) | 983 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.49289225709026 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.93929836831) | 951 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.49289225709026 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.93929836831) | 951 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.72105041386513 vs Dan Best (786.02403637788) | 969 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.49507601260459 vs Roy Connelly (972.42164750396) | 1001 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.48458366265556 vs Matt Shostak (1011.715764906) | 970 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.48458366265556 vs Matt Shostak (1011.715764906) | 970 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.45693350797779 vs David Longstreet (1000) | 941 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.41589904118632 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 914 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.41589904118632 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 914 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.28994815359802 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 895 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.28994815359802 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 895 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.24752996991038 vs Scott Waites (1088.1445672717) | 943 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.24752996991038 vs Scott Waites (1088.1445672717) | 943 |
| 2013-09-07 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.37594775062138 vs Christopher Brackney (1031.0373848965) | 919 |
| 2013-09-20 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.35477538912661 vs Christopher Brackney (1022.9029757227) | 896 |
| 2013-09-27 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 896.2943750959] expected: 0.66576245247352 vs Chris Brackney (1016) | 875 |
| 2013-10-04 | Rated: 875. expected: 0.24446873527699 vs Christopher Brackney (1071.0116459456) | 859 |
| 2013-10-11 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.28349717816606 vs Christopher Brackney (1020.0676658823) | 841 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.2413196229156 vs Scott Waites (1039.986485346) | 826 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.2413196229156 vs Scott Waites (1039.986485346) | 826 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.21070008201108 vs Scott Waites (1055.4309412126) | 813 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.21070008201108 vs Scott Waites (1055.4309412126) | 813 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18646135001894 vs Scott Waites (1068.9157464613) | 801 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18646135001894 vs Scott Waites (1068.9157464613) | 801 |
| 2014-01-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 801.06647359879] expected: 0.79639265906577 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 788 |
| 2014-01-17 | Rated: 788. expected: 0.2196395005912 vs Christopher Brackney (1008.233932175) | 838 |
| 2014-01-31 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 837.94307196216] expected: 0.66621230125638 vs Chris Brackney (958) | 881 |
| 2014-02-07 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.45070912603115 vs Christopher Brackney (915.36241271959) | 852 |
| 2014-02-21 | Rated: 852. expected: 0.31902977542432 vs Christopher Brackney (983.71876185484) | 832 |
| 2014-02-22 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 831.58209437284] expected: 0.72958483917263 vs Chris Brackney (1004) | 814 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.177101784889 vs Scott Waites (1080.8492728625) | 867 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.177101784889 vs Scott Waites (1080.8492728625) | 867 |
| 2014-02-28 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.29146902842958 vs Christopher Brackney (1021.306570293) | 848 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26168651030079 vs Scott Waites (1028.1837870954) | 895 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26168651030079 vs Scott Waites (1028.1837870954) | 895 |
| 2014-09-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 895.25206334075] expected: 0.6946020003886 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 876 |
| 2014-09-12 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.31263953818424 vs Christopher Brackney (1012.8562586462) | 856 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32757692355222 vs Scott Waites (980.93172375465) | 899 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32757692355222 vs Scott Waites (980.93172375465) | 899 |
| 2014-10-03 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 899.03507689266] expected: 0.71403767499167 vs Chris Brackney (1058) | 881 |
| 2014-10-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 880.73348809212] expected: 0.75473814002644 vs Chris Brackney (1076) | 865 |
| 2014-10-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 865.03672905382] expected: 0.786927830656 vs Chris Brackney (1092) | 851 |
| 2014-10-17 | Rated: 851. expected: 0.18758088694386 vs Christopher Brackney (1105.636618838) | 839 |
| 2014-10-24 | Rated: 839. expected: 0.16742454083607 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.6417956024) | 828 |
| 2014-10-24 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 828.28482938649] expected: 0.84881014956019 vs Chris Brackney (1128) | 819 |
| 2014-11-07 | Rated: 819. expected: 0.17165035225293 vs Christopher Brackney (1092.4275971589) | 808 |
| 2014-11-14 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 808.01437745581] expected: 0.84528298717267 vs Chris Brackney (1103) | 798 |
| 2014-11-21 | Rated: 798. expected: 0.12428692719108 vs Christopher Brackney (1137.1745528473) | 790 |
| 2014-12-05 | Rated: 790. expected: 0.11463098601371 vs Christopher Brackney (1145.1289161875) | 847 |
| 2014-12-12 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.1994099924267 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.4652992924) | 898 |
| 2014-12-19 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 898.23776048469] expected: 0.689713378164 vs Chris Brackney (1037) | 878 |
| 2014-12-19 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.26316332931634 vs Christopher Brackney (1056.8583437975) | 861 |
| 2015-01-09 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.22716232018913 vs Christopher Brackney (1073.7007968738) | 846 |
| 2015-01-16 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.19869974784929 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.2391853659) | 833 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35346710827258 vs Scott Waites (937.89664686199) | 874 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35346710827258 vs Scott Waites (937.89664686199) | 874 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.225537389128 vs Robert Zinselmeyer (1088.3127629237) | 924 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.37085742190629 vs Rick Salisbury (1015.8168411052) | 900 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.30931487835703 vs Rick Salisbury (1039.5517161072) | 880 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-04-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 922.63292317332] expected: 0.73628793835146 vs Chris Brackney (1101) | 906 |
| 2015-05-01 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.22799534869034 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.8775719455) | 891 |
| 2015-05-01 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 891.40829768382] expected: 0.79978596329071 vs Chris Brackney (1132) | 879 |
| 2015-05-08 | Rated: 879. expected: 0.17797223039838 vs Christopher Brackney (1144.8136983494) | 868 |
| 2015-05-30 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.15989156163167 vs Christopher Brackney (1156.2039210949) | 858 |
| 2015-05-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 857.76694005557] expected: 0.85499558593506 vs Chris Brackney (1166) | 848 |
| 2015-06-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 848.48665755542] expected: 0.86756079584188 vs Chris Brackney (1175) | 840 |
| 2015-06-05 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.12161684333589 vs Christopher Brackney (1183.4761090661) | 832 |
| 2015-06-25 | Rated: 832. expected: 0.29449351020405 vs Jim Ferrell (983.77011378712) | 813 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38206999321178 vs Scott Waites (896.51854179144) | 853 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38206999321178 vs Scott Waites (896.51854179144) | 853 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49428548972121 vs Scott Waites (856.97102135699) | 885 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49428548972121 vs Scott Waites (856.97102135699) | 885 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58604999156552 vs Scott Waites (824.60529269915) | 847 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58604999156552 vs Scott Waites (824.60529269915) | 847 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.47826508135974 vs Scott Waites (862.11249215934) | 880 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.47826508135974 vs Scott Waites (862.11249215934) | 880 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 859 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 859 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.54346434563613 vs Scott Waites (828.72145736636) | 856 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.54346434563613 vs Scott Waites (828.72145736636) | 856 |
| 2015-10-23 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.19823175247814 vs Christopher Brackney (1098.7502529897) | 875 |
| 2015-11-04 | Rated: 875. expected: 0.26888766295455 vs Scott Holst (1048.7652943713) | 922 |
| 2015-11-09 | Rated: 922. expected: 0.38689853861115 vs Scott Holst (1001.9741048003) | 897 |
| 2015-11-23 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.32151499153431 vs Scott Holst (1026.7356112715) | 876 |
| 2015-12-14 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.25691379090651 vs Scott Holst (1060.5007135554) | 892 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 892. expected: 0.58619259015404 vs Scott Waites (831.50317548708) | 854 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 892. expected: 0.58619259015404 vs Scott Waites (831.50317548708) | 854 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 854. expected: 0.478398654698 vs Scott Waites (869.01950125694) | 823 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 854. expected: 0.478398654698 vs Scott Waites (869.01950125694) | 823 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 823. expected: 0.24197303123158 vs Connor Mullins (1021.3670768267) | 808 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 823. expected: 0.24197303123158 vs Connor Mullins (1021.3670768267) | 808 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14745104176638 vs Jim Burris (1112.8285931159) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14745104176638 vs Jim Burris (1112.8285931159) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-19 | Rated: 783. expected: 0.31474704633792 vs Alex Key (918.15570115615) | 827 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39696376760864 vs Scott Waites (899.63701515761) | 866 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39696376760864 vs Scott Waites (899.63701515761) | 866 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50713364943181 vs Scott Waites (861.04269628456) | 898 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50713364943181 vs Scott Waites (861.04269628456) | 898 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59732270211421 vs Scott Waites (829.4992498482) | 860 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59732270211421 vs Scott Waites (829.4992498482) | 860 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.4888804875922 vs Scott Waites (867.72790278351) | 893 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.4888804875922 vs Scott Waites (867.72790278351) | 893 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58267913336778 vs Scott Waites (835.01625398941) | 856 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58267913336778 vs Scott Waites (835.01625398941) | 856 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47654852610959 vs Scott Waites (872.30771852494) | 890 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47654852610959 vs Scott Waites (872.30771852494) | 890 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57314432647278 vs Scott Waites (838.80682419596) | 853 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57314432647278 vs Scott Waites (838.80682419596) | 853 |
| 2016-08-27 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.1876296858438 vs Dan Best (1107.5809974047) | 841 |
| 2016-09-10 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.15802978664982 vs Dan Best (1131.6231095266) | 831 |
| 2016-09-16 | Rated: 831. expected: 0.14322653004903 vs Dan Best (1141.7370158722) | 822 |
| 2016-09-24 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.13086629514941 vs Dan Best (1150.9035137954) | 878 |
| 2016-09-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 877.62455711044] expected: 0.77752717500967 vs Danno (1095) | 927 |
| 2016-10-08 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.27172066108028 vs Dan Best (1098.2701307135) | 910 |
| 2016-10-22 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.23435607193503 vs Dan Best (1115.6602530227) | 895 |
| 2016-10-29 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.20479955564202 vs Dan Best (1130.6590416265) | 946 |
| 2016-11-19 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.33509467984438 vs Dan Best (1065.0369100545) | 989 |
| 2016-11-25 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.451962756858 vs Dan Best (1022.4829695645) | 1024 |
| 2016-12-03 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.55246543885874 vs Dan Best (987.40858600343) | 989 |
| 2016-12-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.45155870131311 vs Dan Best (1022.7663740904) | 960 |
| 2016-12-17 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.3710598649367 vs Dan Best (1051.6661309744) | 1000 |
| 2017-01-07 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.57095730932485 vs Dan Best (950.35874818524) | 1027 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.70519761746877 vs Scott Waites (875.48806109022) | 982 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.70519761746877 vs Scott Waites (875.48806109022) | 982 |
| 2017-01-21 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.5842407697318 vs Dan Best (922.90001598203) | 945 |
| 2017-01-28 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.47800806831583 vs Dan Best (960.29142524486) | 978 |
| 2017-02-04 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.5730357170899 vs Dan Best (926.88394161708) | 941 |
| 2017-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.46584714854755 vs Dan Best (964.76884384117) | 975 |
| 2017-02-25 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.64742793318923 vs Dan Best (869.42258739099) | 934 |
| 2017-03-02 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.66766821926447 vs Tom Abromaitis (812.80446806464) | 955 |
| 2017-03-04 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 955.26923396707] expected: 0.436633998681 vs Danno (911) | 919 |
| 2017-03-04 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.45971252682768 vs Dan Best (947.05542408442) | 890 |
| 2017-03-16 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 889.57839828303] expected: 0.57768467449968 vs Danno (944) | 927 |
| 2017-03-16 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.27212358204164 vs Dave Mareske (1097.916588034) | 974 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.46265268283351 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 944 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.46265268283351 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 944 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.37923195428411 vs Colman Quill (1029.6097717013) | 984 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.37923195428411 vs Colman Quill (1029.6097717013) | 984 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4700241135789 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1018 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4700241135789 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1018 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.55021470423179 vs Francis Biss (982.98922439755) | 983 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.50761733474387 vs Jeff Ital (977.7065241309) | 951 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.54360823549852 vs Scott Waites (920.62070860822) | 948 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.54360823549852 vs Scott Waites (920.62070860822) | 948 |
| 2017-04-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.59081510523782 vs Dan Best (884.18720115002) | 910 |
| 2017-04-15 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.48273838416962 vs Dan Best (921.99936788524) | 879 |
| 2017-04-29 | Rated: 879. expected: 0.4299747163308 vs Dan Best (927.9804802939) | 915 |
| 2017-05-06 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.53376936896576 vs Dan Best (891.49886213907) | 945 |
| 2017-05-13 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.63853665439887 vs Dan Best (846.1513726136) | 904 |
| 2017-06-03 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.4790153969347 vs Dan Best (918.59016617563) | 937 |
| 2017-06-10 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.57393233715713 vs Dan Best (885.24715157945) | 964 |
| 2017-07-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.7240190598505 vs Dan Best (796.451636236) | 918 |
| 2017-07-08 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.53694165162714 vs Dan Best (892.28344962046) | 948 |
| 2017-07-15 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.62041904767118 vs Dan Best (862.6477153246) | 908 |
| 2017-07-22 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.44458248526943 vs Dan Best (946.66688861997) | 944 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.4058752452982 vs Jeff Ital (1010.1940335545) | 918 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21827727193853 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.6176886766) | 904 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21827727193853 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.6176886766) | 904 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.22707083582764 vs Rick Reinesch (1116.7913343409) | 889 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.58259317127843 vs Dan Best (831.07766397707) | 916 |
| 2017-08-05 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.52720321347543 vs Dan Best (897.07858693496) | 882 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.44068449439539 vs Scott Waites (923.41163568012) | 918 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.44068449439539 vs Scott Waites (923.41163568012) | 918 |
| 2017-08-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.40786600847294 vs Dan Best (982.76099191067) | 956 |
| 2017-09-09 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.51601990780014 vs Dan Best (944.86441645294) | 923 |
| 2017-09-16 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39544073925395 vs Dan Best (996.7429875253) | 898 |
| 2017-09-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.42685548976244 vs Dan Best (949.19330628933) | 935 |
| 2017-10-07 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.40569606393094 vs Dan Best (1001.3231249609) | 909 |
| 2017-10-08 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38134434525242 vs Dan Best (993.05267041617) | 949 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58743162650696 vs Scott Waites (887.61544332143) | 911 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58743162650696 vs Scott Waites (887.61544332143) | 911 |
| 2017-10-14 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.40206891451663 vs Dan Best (979.94025393947) | 949 |
| 2017-10-21 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.45651511918477 vs Dan Best (979.29292063771) | 920 |
| 2017-10-28 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.439903986952 vs Dan Best (961.96183324757) | 956 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.5441932118173 vs Scott Waites (925.21106741787) | 921 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.5441932118173 vs Scott Waites (925.21106741787) | 921 |
| 2017-11-04 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.46206545697936 vs Dan Best (947.41037209093) | 891 |
| 2017-11-11 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.49112794786398 vs Dan Best (897.16558039598) | 860 |
| 2017-11-18 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.34543374753329 vs Dan Best (971.03553856104) | 838 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33125475681223 vs Scott Waites (960.03943297418) | 817 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33125475681223 vs Scott Waites (960.03943297418) | 817 |
| 2017-12-02 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.26620513215972 vs Dan Best (993.14329840317) | 800 |
| 2017-12-09 | Rated: 800. expected: 0.22971948946621 vs Dan Best (1010.1804268614) | 785 |
| 2017-12-16 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.20086858427526 vs Dan Best (1024.8824741872) | 772 |
| 2017-12-30 | Rated: 772. expected: 0.29066970040637 vs Dan Best (926.97949938888) | 753 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21184272147449 vs Scott Waites (981.23973741016) | 803 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21184272147449 vs Scott Waites (981.23973741016) | 803 |
| 2018-01-06 | Rated: 803. expected: 0.28805818030947 vs Dan Best (960.18571656029) | 785 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30168668552679 vs Scott Waites (930.79767158453) | 830 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30168668552679 vs Scott Waites (930.79767158453) | 830 |
| 2018-01-13 | Rated: 830. expected: 0.28349918861198 vs Dan Best (991.06594651316) | 876 |
| 2018-01-20 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.23870529844991 vs Dave Mareske (1077.4762992898) | 861 |
| 2018-01-27 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.38113084684747 vs Dan Best (945.20989458432) | 837 |
| 2018-02-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.31792588866288 vs Dan Best (969.60226878256) | 817 |
| 2018-02-10 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.2698118258425 vs Dan Best (989.94952565699) | 864 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46823031429026 vs Scott Waites (886.10561945824) | 898 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46823031429026 vs Scott Waites (886.10561945824) | 898 |
| 2018-02-24 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.46712619940815 vs Dan Best (920.87605686635) | 932 |
| 2018-03-03 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.56472294883094 vs Dan Best (886.77213362847) | 896 |
| 2018-03-10 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.46134435424274 vs Dan Best (922.91440235365) | 866 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42061058102267 vs Justin Williamson (921.63614637894) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42061058102267 vs Justin Williamson (921.63614637894) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.530880935065 vs Dan Best (881.51438147468) | 933 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.34790499556135 vs Burnie Hegdahl (1042.1400833455) | 975 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28511188810739 vs Jim Burris (1134.6890995788) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28511188810739 vs Jim Burris (1134.6890995788) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.4400389945612 vs Mike Bistodeau (998.8666483866) | 929 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.4400389945612 vs Mike Bistodeau (998.8666483866) | 929 |
| 2018-03-24 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.46036015954278 vs Dan Best (956.60250932679) | 900 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.56853921773187 vs Scott Waites (852.07235957282) | 864 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.56853921773187 vs Scott Waites (852.07235957282) | 864 |
| 2018-04-07 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.36732716487287 vs Dan Best (958.45045634741) | 904 |
| 2018-04-14 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.47992161889641 vs Dan Best (917.95939489928) | 937 |
| 2018-04-21 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.61295396702885 vs Dan Best (857.13390415079) | 962 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.60428143493576 vs Scott Waites (888.45886950766) | 987 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.60428143493576 vs Scott Waites (888.45886950766) | 987 |
| 2018-04-28 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.64891858939312 vs Dan Best (880.28704767358) | 945 |
| 2018-05-05 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.55515043098578 vs Dan Best (906.52099713341) | 909 |
| 2018-05-12 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45257928145514 vs Dan Best (942.0506247165) | 944 |
| 2018-06-02 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55302455707075 vs Dan Best (907.01569872963) | 909 |
| 2018-06-09 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45206784166561 vs Dan Best (942.40927038215) | 944 |
| 2018-06-16 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.59997514100415 vs Dan Best (873.58148973258) | 970 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64912074503259 vs Scott Waites (863.13288134355) | 928 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64912074503259 vs Scott Waites (863.13288134355) | 928 |
| 2018-06-23 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.61316426670068 vs Dan Best (847.97989875684) | 953 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56909795929952 vs Scott Waites (904.67660902564) | 981 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56909795929952 vs Scott Waites (904.67660902564) | 981 |
| 2018-07-14 | Rated: 981. expected: 0.25603823009837 vs Dave Mareske (1166.2983210159) | 965 |
| 2018-07-21 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.64822837957791 vs Dan Best (858.81310348491) | 924 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.31111188411635 vs David Ginnard (1062.0928367037) | 904 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.43185740552678 vs Richard Trippeer (951.64679154744) | 940 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.5271041552897 vs Dan Best (921.14762322076) | 970 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.6119314231123 vs Dan Best (890.8822891593) | 931 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32824258369754 vs Craig Walters (1055.4070189484) | 974 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32824258369754 vs Craig Walters (1055.4070189484) | 974 |
| 2018-08-04 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.50742977564616 vs Dan Best (968.83688305758) | 942 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59232879244464 vs Scott Waites (877.09887842081) | 904 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59232879244464 vs Scott Waites (877.09887842081) | 904 |
| 2018-08-11 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.36350693691232 vs Dan Best (1001.3123886989) | 945 |
| 2018-09-08 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.64022933380727 vs Dan Best (844.87607269874) | 904 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48416362672967 vs Scott Waites (915.00792113726) | 873 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48416362672967 vs Scott Waites (915.00792113726) | 873 |
| 2018-10-20 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.48151471299953 vs Dan Best (885.8507500624) | 906 |
| 2018-10-27 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.57615415649234 vs Dan Best (852.66769169437) | 933 |
| 2018-11-03 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.64989564083012 vs Dan Best (825.54155770988) | 891 |
| 2018-11-10 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.53429075675763 vs Dan Best (867.13487872301) | 921 |
| 2018-11-17 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.61813652290766 vs Dan Best (837.3294871555) | 945 |
| 2018-12-01 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.68145902296336 vs Dan Best (812.89022462159) | 965 |
| 2019-01-05 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.72248136357941 vs Dan Best (798.78620160314) | 919 |
| 2019-01-11 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.60487849538416 vs Dan Best (845.02500887223) | 944 |
| 2019-01-12 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.67157429223605 vs Dan Best (819.73723257681) | 901 |
| 2019-01-19 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.55487037093026 vs Dan Best (862.71798727992) | 929 |
| 2019-01-26 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.63310062614645 vs Dan Best (834.22969101946) | 920 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46266070659 vs Scott Waites (945.99439324796) | 954 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46266070659 vs Scott Waites (945.99439324796) | 954 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.65484777157344 vs Dan Best (842.74813109283) | 912 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.53926671607794 vs Dan Best (884.65838847353) | 941 |
| 2019-02-08 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.6210644685331 vs Dan Best (855.17145830252) | 901 |
| 2019-02-16 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.50874952836126 vs Dan Best (894.91958428864) | 868 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43757523763859 vs Scott Waites (911.60467846972) | 840 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43757523763859 vs Scott Waites (911.60467846972) | 840 |
| 2019-02-23 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.28760010222409 vs Dan Best (997.57392495896) | 822 |
| 2019-03-01 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.24663495876591 vs Dan Best (1015.9803315013) | 870 |
| 2019-03-02 | Rated: 870. expected: 0.36290437325149 vs Dan Best (967.76496886233) | 911 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18969327747042 vs Scott Martin (1163.2390006906) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18969327747042 vs Scott Martin (1163.2390006906) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.24152703140799 vs Rick Reinesch (1138.789745583) | 925 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.57251004668707 vs Dan Best (909.25712011543) | 987 |
| 2019-03-30 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.64680330128004 vs Dan Best (881.8977631034) | 1010 |
| 2019-04-06 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.70423319580383 vs Dan Best (859.29317438532) | 965 |
| 2019-04-13 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.58638677631082 vs Dan Best (904.36409891676) | 991 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.5734222074891 vs Scott Waites (939.60949367859) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.5734222074891 vs Scott Waites (939.60949367859) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-27 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.64953453117432 vs Dan Best (910.81719568336) | 1040 |
| 2019-05-04 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.71840017481178 vs Dan Best (877.30638061209) | 1058 |
| 2019-05-11 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.75839520131146 vs Dan Best (859.28399180004) | 1009 |
| 2019-05-18 | Rated: 1009. expected: 0.68509175699914 vs Dan Best (873.97411467678) | 965 |
| 2019-06-01 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.56748320245194 vs Dan Best (917.81998712472) | 929 |
| 2019-06-08 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.46388519972337 vs Dan Best (954.13891208165) | 899 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48085686921522 vs Scott Waites (912.30851495789) | 932 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48085686921522 vs Scott Waites (912.30851495789) | 932 |
| 2019-06-29 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.4926300201062 vs Dan Best (937.12155749502) | 900 |
| 2019-07-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.47390485223305 vs Dan Best (918.14925635157) | 934 |
| 2019-07-13 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.57078749467481 vs Dan Best (884.47916689449) | 961 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61575058249117 vs Scott Waites (879.08335458767) | 986 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61575058249117 vs Scott Waites (879.08335458767) | 986 |
| 2019-07-20 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.21164690277 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1214.4435443106) | 972 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.60368881553696 vs Dan Best (898.88927964048) | 933 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.49348784619543 vs Dan Best (937.52536383484) | 965 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.48171947059926 vs Peter Ward (977.70827732329) | 934 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.41393798105604 vs Richard Burton (994.40331990669) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.41393798105604 vs Richard Burton (994.40331990669) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-08-03 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.6429418755114 vs Dan Best (841.82688267417) | 903 |
| 2019-08-10 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.52878618930142 vs Dan Best (882.9751627069) | 933 |
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.66527362363522 vs Dan Best (813.67585234895) | 954 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31786318814414 vs Paul Lauger (1086.6525008258) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31786318814414 vs Paul Lauger (1086.6525008258) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39790758175578 vs Mark Harms (1005.9523776625) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39790758175578 vs Mark Harms (1005.9523776625) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38310098483992 vs Jeff Kouba (991.7603233973) | 948 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38310098483992 vs Jeff Kouba (991.7603233973) | 948 |
| 2019-09-07 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.21056441645161 vs Dan Best, Paul Works, Dave Mareske (1177.572686843) | 935 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61383106018097 vs Scott Waites (854.4913918671) | 896 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61383106018097 vs Scott Waites (854.4913918671) | 896 |
| 2019-09-14 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.52468524488851 vs Dan Best (878.83297800713) | 926 |
| 2019-09-21 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.60983712458815 vs Dan Best (848.41283368) | 951 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58161447212805 vs Scott Waites (893.77657971869) | 914 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58161447212805 vs Scott Waites (893.77657971869) | 914 |
| 2019-10-05 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.5790461839519 vs Dan Best (858.60849879993) | 877 |
| 2019-10-18 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.50532084758813 vs Dan Best (873.30255682812) | 845 |
| 2019-10-26 | Rated: 845. expected: 0.41360318536895 vs Dan Best (905.64309107376) | 883 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43135874093566 vs Scott Waites (930.99990593488) | 919 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43135874093566 vs Scott Waites (930.99990593488) | 919 |
| 2019-11-02 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.57271209912579 vs Dan Best (868.11369493737) | 882 |
| 2019-11-16 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.40821056332115 vs Dan Best (946.51318800072) | 920 |
| 2019-11-23 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.51634445130743 vs Dan Best (908.63866405327) | 919 |
| 2019-12-07 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.51340257009215 vs Dan Best (909.68470893695) | 886 |
| 2019-12-14 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.41933968341988 vs Dan Best (942.54247342284) | 923 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2020-01-04 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.63298448783434 vs Dan Best (867.31654129636) | 921 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53790987903956 vs Scott Waites (894.60686535476) | 887 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53790987903956 vs Scott Waites (894.60686535476) | 887 |
| 2020-01-11 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.47006260054477 vs Dan Best (907.82754851776) | 889 |
| 2020-01-18 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.47568151886518 vs Dan Best (905.91155495263) | 923 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49131854716537 vs Scott Waites (929.03309761329) | 956 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49131854716537 vs Scott Waites (929.03309761329) | 956 |
| 2020-02-01 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.62759926855528 vs Dan Best (865.33123862484) | 916 |
| 2020-02-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.51510957846882 vs Dan Best (905.49759181238) | 883 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48061406329084 vs Scott Waites (896.47748463188) | 916 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48061406329084 vs Scott Waites (896.47748463188) | 916 |
| 2020-02-15 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.46771581249739 vs Dan Best (938.46460483438) | 886 |
| 2020-02-22 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.38359346090009 vs Dan Best (968.39841683421) | 861 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49678105255613 vs Scott Waites (863.23678468249) | 893 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49678105255613 vs Scott Waites (863.23678468249) | 893 |
| 2020-02-29 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.36000343636209 vs Dan Best (992.94839833182) | 934 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64399324311582 vs Scott Waites (831.03077204608) | 957 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64399324311582 vs Scott Waites (831.03077204608) | 957 |
| 2020-03-07 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.53324367052315 vs Dan Best (933.86580270332) | 987 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73671980362694 vs Scott Waites (808.2463396055) | 940 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73671980362694 vs Scott Waites (808.2463396055) | 940 |
| 2020-03-14 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.56129125238944 vs Dan Best (897.1952080812) | 968 |
| 2020-03-20 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.63858119488262 vs Dan Best (869.11784823413) | 927 |
| 2020-03-21 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.52446406068707 vs Dan Best (909.98704470661) | 957 |
| 2020-03-25 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.14207089983034 vs Dave Mareske (1269.3785071197) | 1012 |
| 2020-03-28 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.6818805793033 vs Dan Best (879.55274459059) | 1032 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73431213323618 vs Scott Waites (855.39640703762) | 985 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73431213323618 vs Scott Waites (855.39640703762) | 985 |
| 2020-04-04 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.67353181282379 vs Dan Best (859.193101666) | 942 |
| 2020-04-08 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.55688675423903 vs Dan Best (902.29913768672) | 970 |
| 2020-04-09 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.63482355433514 vs Dan Best (873.93988995802) | 993 |
| 2020-04-10 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.69421533765805 vs Dan Best (850.56859743547) | 949 |
| 2020-04-11 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.57709475310837 vs Dan Best (894.99837904558) | 976 |
| 2020-04-18 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.5918916621763 vs Dan Best (911.41329818391) | 938 |
| 2020-04-23 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.41268181234545 vs Dan Best (999.30324833667) | 976 |
| 2020-04-25 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.29819296302134 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1124.6881312449) | 957 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.51709565697005 vs Dan Best (945.11608843064) | 988 |
| 2020-05-02 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.60462366701509 vs Dan Best (914.21021047673) | 949 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.53016448023261 vs Dan Best (928.01408754588) | 915 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.51813585884922 vs Scott Waites (902.39238356474) | 946 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.51813585884922 vs Scott Waites (902.39238356474) | 946 |
| 2020-05-09 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.47706995094293 vs Dan Best (961.94461428076) | 979 |
| 2020-05-14 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.58592214668546 vs Dan Best (918.69683575364) | 1006 |
| 2020-05-16 | Rated: 1006. expected: 0.65816091314058 vs Dan Best (892.1958531415) | 996 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.65162861704961 vs Dan Best (887.21692958455) | 1018 |
| 2020-05-22 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.1737075393425 vs Dave Mareske (1288.9260487261) | 1007 |
| 2020-05-23 | Rated: 1007. expected: 0.69378434071536 vs Dan Best (864.92116107572) | 963 |
| 2020-05-25 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.58480652486994 vs Dan Best (903.49532412411) | 926 |
| 2020-05-29 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.51699537118611 vs Dan Best (914.18585521383) | 893 |
| 2020-05-30 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.43167719989969 vs Dan Best (940.77438743729) | 865 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49057048006347 vs Scott Waites (871.55307853109) | 898 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49057048006347 vs Scott Waites (871.55307853109) | 898 |
| 2020-06-06 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.067675659596057 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1353.653810124) | 894 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.57856750956558 vs Scott Waites (838.94958925515) | 857 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.57856750956558 vs Scott Waites (838.94958925515) | 857 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.24798708328834 vs Dan Best (1049.7184958093) | 905 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.36447005145887 vs Dan Best (1001.5896691397) | 882 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.50866561656352 vs Scott Waites (875.97790986734) | 913 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.50866561656352 vs Scott Waites (875.97790986734) | 913 |
| 2020-06-21 | Rated: 913. expected: 0.34428896931594 vs Dan Best (1024.9157524331) | 891 |
| 2020-06-26 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.30291431162165 vs Dan Best (1035.7865495186) | 936 |
| 2020-06-27 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.42126034405192 vs Dan Best (991.17306546234) | 909 |
| 2020-07-01 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.35979205919482 vs Dan Best (1009.1077930409) | 950 |
| 2020-07-03 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.39329082890614 vs Dan Best (1025.3066962278) | 989 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.69669772604944 vs Scott Waites (844.53250932741) | 944 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.69669772604944 vs Scott Waites (844.53250932741) | 944 |
| 2020-07-11 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.46920866853417 vs Dan Best (965.4231178479) | 978 |
| 2020-07-17 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.60529790114523 vs Dan Best (903.7201071125) | 939 |
| 2020-07-18 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.51222331307704 vs Dan Best (930.50467948418) | 906 |
| 2020-07-24 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.4286814114293 vs Dan Best (955.89748106237) | 943 |
| 2020-07-25 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.5502920155377 vs Dan Best (907.93495478985) | 908 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.5271421214138 vs Scott Waites (889.12116379457) | 874 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.5271421214138 vs Scott Waites (889.12116379457) | 874 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.43244213062498 vs Dan Best (921.23286050179) | 846 |
| 2020-08-07 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.2938013021223 vs Dan Best (998.34927848445) | 827 |
| 2020-08-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.2507519057561 vs Dan Best (1017.1525618203) | 811 |
| 2020-08-14 | Rated: 811. expected: 0.24315568078698 vs Dan Best (1008.2488540687) | 859 |
| 2020-08-15 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.35886041109563 vs Dan Best (959.81081763905) | 900 |
| 2020-08-21 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.48087991667224 vs Dan Best (913.2924764629) | 933 |
| 2020-08-22 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.57559021953956 vs Dan Best (880.06879112993) | 960 |
| 2020-08-28 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.55324857132529 vs Scott Waites (922.85825956506) | 989 |
| 2020-08-28 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.55324857132529 vs Scott Waites (922.85825956506) | 989 |
| 2020-08-29 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.69105068427483 vs Dan Best (849.1509345248) | 1009 |
| 2020-09-12 | Rated: 1009. expected: 0.7490868171374 vs Dan Best (818.9965301489) | 1025 |
| 2020-09-19 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.72324301307358 vs Dan Best (858.12573877813) | 1043 |
| 2020-09-25 | Rated: 1043. expected: 0.70186208857152 vs Scott Waites (894.26616812987) | 998 |
| 2020-09-25 | Rated: 1043. expected: 0.70186208857152 vs Scott Waites (894.26616812987) | 998 |
| 2020-09-27 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.71241497457203 vs Dan Best (840.41329161484) | 952 |
| 2020-10-03 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.60966826981928 vs Dan Best (874.53610555402) | 977 |
| 2020-10-17 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.71115158930011 vs Dan Best (820.48311894519) | 995 |
| 2020-10-23 | Rated: 995. expected: 0.57963982107823 vs Scott Waites (939.18534179845) | 1022 |
| 2020-10-23 | Rated: 995. expected: 0.57963982107823 vs Scott Waites (939.18534179845) | 1022 |
| 2020-10-24 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.72108839584307 vs Dan Best (856.99123072704) | 1040 |
| 2020-11-07 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.64412885012548 vs Dan Best (936.92801209396) | 1063 |
| 2020-11-13 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.70424624567143 vs Scott Waites (912.28229034746) | 1082 |
| 2020-11-13 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.70424624567143 vs Scott Waites (912.28229034746) | 1082 |
| 2020-11-14 | Rated: 1082. expected: 0.7767164467217 vs Dan Best (865.43769339616) | 1096 |
| 2020-11-21 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.81589687534986 vs Dan Best (837.37035585006) | 1108 |
| 2020-11-27 | Rated: 1108. expected: 0.84137778999571 vs Dan Best (818.14918108466) | 1054 |
| 2020-11-28 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.74033134141502 vs Dan Best (871.99735964438) | 1071 |
| 2020-12-04 | Rated: 1071. expected: 0.77577573656013 vs Dan Best (855.37856549495) | 1021 |
| 2020-12-08 | Rated: 1021. expected: 0.68825401280286 vs Dan Best (883.42084789945) | 1041 |
| 2020-12-12 | Rated: 1041. expected: 0.7353522583516 vs Dan Best (863.46910471884) | 994 |
| 2020-12-16 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.61786179193578 vs Dan Best (910.53164925334) | 1018 |
| 2020-12-19 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.68122833364594 vs Dan Best (886.07480393723) | 974 |
| 2020-12-23 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.56344720555605 vs Dan Best (929.67341729057) | 938 |
| 2020-12-26 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.46017206928926 vs Dan Best (965.73403844615) | 973 |
| 2020-12-30 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.55891811162382 vs Dan Best (931.86841686348) | 1001 |
| 2020-12-31 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.63655757018236 vs Dan Best (903.6391760074) | 1024 |
| 2021-01-02 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.69566724055082 vs Dan Best (880.37886049907) | 979 |
| 2021-01-06 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.59182158092214 vs Dan Best (914.46369660177) | 941 |
| 2021-01-08 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.16353085442112 vs Dave Mareske (1224.5400880483) | 931 |
| 2021-01-09 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.46932743459626 vs Dan Best (952.34027778078) | 901 |
| 2021-01-13 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.3849843542771 vs Dan Best (982.37723359494) | 940 |
| 2021-01-16 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.49565940188355 vs Dan Best (943.01623226868) | 908 |
| 2021-01-18 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.40511977754314 vs Dan Best (974.73843398922) | 882 |
| 2021-01-23 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.33557043944778 vs Dan Best (1000.666099752) | 861 |
| 2021-01-27 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.28340955740488 vs Dan Best (1022.1426078766) | 843 |
| 2021-01-29 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.42803784484662 vs Scott Waites (893.35405007043) | 880 |
| 2021-01-29 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.42803784484662 vs Scott Waites (893.35405007043) | 880 |
| 2021-01-30 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.28441813148911 vs Dan Best (1040.2808195506) | 862 |
| 2021-02-01 | Rated: 862. expected: 0.084679735703926 vs Dave Mareske (1275.5174333848) | 857 |
| 2021-02-03 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.23869768226436 vs Dan Best (1058.4835799659) | 842 |
| 2021-02-06 | Rated: 842. expected: 0.2084788280331 vs Dan Best (1073.7602316308) | 893 |
| 2021-02-11 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.32105397857625 vs Dan Best (1023.1028766249) | 872 |
| 2021-02-13 | Rated: 872. expected: 0.29576119189253 vs Dan Best (1022.7115064346) | 917 |
| 2021-02-17 | Rated: 917. expected: 0.41360719002443 vs Dan Best (977.64022271569) | 891 |
| 2021-02-19 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.54913284367938 vs Scott Waites (856.74847214061) | 920 |
| 2021-02-19 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.54913284367938 vs Scott Waites (856.74847214061) | 920 |
| 2021-02-20 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.38126502023637 vs Dan Best (1004.1110828773) | 960 |
| 2021-02-24 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.49350701148852 vs Dan Best (964.51204417238) | 992 |
| 2021-02-26 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.58536386822637 vs Dan Best (932.09649290765) | 1019 |
| 2021-02-27 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.66977652963624 vs Dan Best (896.15120490476) | 976 |
| 2021-03-03 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.5530228437592 vs Dan Best (939.01690280148) | 941 |
| 2021-03-05 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.65725748666511 vs Scott Waites (827.89297413609) | 899 |
| 2021-03-05 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.65725748666511 vs Scott Waites (827.89297413609) | 899 |
| 2021-03-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.39314844217017 vs Dan Best (974.41036480207) | 874 |
| 2021-03-12 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.5058174298576 vs Scott Waites (869.95745328266) | 906 |
| 2021-03-12 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.5058174298576 vs Scott Waites (869.95745328266) | 906 |
| 2021-03-13 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.36850332211842 vs Dan Best (999.57186510096) | 946 |
| 2021-03-20 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.48107592613771 vs Dan Best (959.15607771654) | 979 |
| 2021-03-26 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.69205898670035 vs Scott Waites (838.32976879355) | 935 |
| 2021-03-26 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.69205898670035 vs Scott Waites (838.32976879355) | 935 |
| 2021-03-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.52517511517209 vs Dan Best (917.49173288764) | 901 |
| 2021-04-03 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.42839177205066 vs Dan Best (951.10294025865) | 938 |
| 2021-04-09 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.53373906819068 vs Dan Best (914.5200136699) | 968 |
| 2021-04-10 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.61766107320097 vs Dan Best (884.6793140341) | 992 |
| 2021-04-16 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.65240624276859 vs Scott Waites (882.62154394237) | 1014 |
| 2021-04-16 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.65240624276859 vs Scott Waites (882.62154394237) | 1014 |
| 2021-04-17 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.63779168485366 vs Dan Best (915.7118252939) | 973 |
| 2021-04-19 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.52368378874788 vs Dan Best (956.53049312454) | 1003 |
| 2021-04-26 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.63781800149926 vs Dan Best (904.6920353582) | 1026 |
| 2021-05-01 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.53734731716649 vs Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 992 |
| 2021-05-01 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.53734731716649 vs Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 992 |
| 2021-05-03 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.6605911274365 vs Dan Best (876.31618193682) | 1014 |
| 2021-05-07 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.70771941469763 vs Scott Waites (860.37554347956) | 1033 |
| 2021-05-07 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.70771941469763 vs Scott Waites (860.37554347956) | 1033 |
| 2021-05-08 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.7363314255429 vs Dan Best (854.59401409275) | 1050 |
| 2021-05-10 | Rated: 1050. expected: 0.77241292441425 vs Dan Best (837.7192253275) | 1001 |
| 2021-05-14 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.65821556588454 vs Dan Best (887.15365249001) | 1023 |
| 2021-05-15 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.64014305987587 vs Dan Best (922.94113655011) | 982 |
| 2021-05-17 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.52600968291186 vs Dan Best (963.91029238217) | 1012 |
| 2021-05-28 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.61098418954776 vs Dan Best (933.57491208852) | 1037 |
| 2021-05-29 | Rated: 1037. expected: 0.67670744420377 vs Dan Best (908.67790021958) | 1058 |
| 2021-05-29 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.72684472828643 vs Dan Best (887.98717664862) | 1075 |
| 2021-05-30 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.76443794495495 vs Dan Best (870.50523925895) | 1026 |
| 2021-06-04 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.67192485510133 vs Dan Best (901.46104919372) | 983 |
| 2021-06-05 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.55523111598272 vs Dan Best (944.46423992021) | 947 |
| 2021-06-11 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.45265286346302 vs Dan Best (979.9990313431) | 982 |
Games logged: 496 Played Won Lost
Games won: 225
Attacking Win: 41.3% (247 attempts)
Defending Win: 49.4% (249 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |