| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40203878161988 vs Scott Waites (1053.962027973) | 1023 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40203878161988 vs Scott Waites (1053.962027973) | 1023 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51051477303251 vs Scott Waites (1015.6925099967) | 990 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51051477303251 vs Scott Waites (1015.6925099967) | 990 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.41678666019002 vs Scott Waites (1048.3654554708) | 1027 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.41678666019002 vs Scott Waites (1048.3654554708) | 1027 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.52295242901682 vs Scott Waites (1011.0398017229) | 1058 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.52295242901682 vs Scott Waites (1011.0398017229) | 1058 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.60970573321661 vs Scott Waites (980.50875718001) | 1019 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.60970573321661 vs Scott Waites (980.50875718001) | 1019 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.49923737849975 vs Scott Waites (1019.5299241059) | 987 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.49923737849975 vs Scott Waites (1019.5299241059) | 987 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.40825516344757 vs Scott Waites (1051.4811163299) | 961 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.40825516344757 vs Scott Waites (1051.4811163299) | 961 |
| 1990-08-12 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1032 |
| 1990-08-12 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1032 |
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.59107559631494 vs Scott Waites (968) | 1026 |
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.59107559631494 vs Scott Waites (968) | 1026 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.57452107132143 vs Scott Waites (973.82883816416) | 989 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.57452107132143 vs Scott Waites (973.82883816416) | 989 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.46895768745152 vs Scott Waites (1010.5981867287) | 959 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.46895768745152 vs Scott Waites (1010.5981867287) | 959 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.3846651357434 vs Scott Waites (1040.6114787256) | 934 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.3846651357434 vs Scott Waites (1040.6114787256) | 934 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.31964126785807 vs Scott Waites (1065.2300474132) | 914 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.31964126785807 vs Scott Waites (1065.2300474132) | 914 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.2712459488774 vs Scott Waites (1085.6870885561) | 897 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.2712459488774 vs Scott Waites (1085.6870885561) | 897 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.23395701294438 vs Scott Waites (1103.0468292843) | 946 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.23395701294438 vs Scott Waites (1103.0468292843) | 946 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.34936909932893 vs Scott Waites (1054.0200781127) | 956 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.34936909932893 vs Scott Waites (1054.0200781127) | 956 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.37548555640329 vs Scott Waites (1044.3797004698) | 996 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.37548555640329 vs Scott Waites (1044.3797004698) | 996 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.48789828415394 vs Scott Waites (1004.4107760796) | 965 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.48789828415394 vs Scott Waites (1004.4107760796) | 965 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.39972404947212 vs Scott Waites (1035.6362662654) | 1003 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.39972404947212 vs Scott Waites (1035.6362662654) | 1003 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.50831932774505 vs Scott Waites (997.21860543164) | 1002 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.50831932774505 vs Scott Waites (997.21860543164) | 1002 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.506114436686 vs Scott Waites (997.75104240733) | 970 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.506114436686 vs Scott Waites (997.75104240733) | 970 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.41430244437905 vs Scott Waites (1030.1423663552) | 975 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.41430244437905 vs Scott Waites (1030.1423663552) | 975 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.42901946457048 vs Scott Waites (1024.6577227955) | 1012 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.42901946457048 vs Scott Waites (1024.6577227955) | 1012 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.53431927495185 vs Scott Waites (988.114968528) | 1042 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.53431927495185 vs Scott Waites (988.114968528) | 1042 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1042. expected: 0.61816109613116 vs Scott Waites (958.31140212492) | 1002 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1042. expected: 0.61816109613116 vs Scott Waites (958.31140212492) | 1002 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.50593792619764 vs Scott Waites (997.87371227731) | 970 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.50593792619764 vs Scott Waites (997.87371227731) | 970 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.41414688241331 vs Scott Waites (1030.253739554) | 943 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.41414688241331 vs Scott Waites (1030.253739554) | 943 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.34189737842551 vs Scott Waites (1056.7591400284) | 921 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.34189737842551 vs Scott Waites (1056.7591400284) | 921 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.28752150346769 vs Scott Waites (1078.6405722476) | 903 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.28752150346769 vs Scott Waites (1078.6405722476) | 903 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.24656906002908 vs Scott Waites (1097.0419484696) | 887 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.24656906002908 vs Scott Waites (1097.0419484696) | 887 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.21417544367224 vs Scott Waites (1112.8223683114) | 873 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.21417544367224 vs Scott Waites (1112.8223683114) | 873 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.18855395842469 vs Scott Waites (1126.5295967065) | 861 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.18855395842469 vs Scott Waites (1126.5295967065) | 861 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.16826453670913 vs Scott Waites (1138.5970500456) | 850 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.16826453670913 vs Scott Waites (1138.5970500456) | 850 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 850. expected: 0.15144799051468 vs Scott Waites (1149.365980395) | 904 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 850. expected: 0.15144799051468 vs Scott Waites (1149.365980395) | 904 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.24977324609206 vs Scott Waites (1095.058651788) | 920 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.24977324609206 vs Scott Waites (1095.058651788) | 920 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.28586922311359 vs Scott Waites (1079.0441395379) | 902 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.28586922311359 vs Scott Waites (1079.0441395379) | 902 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24518380692429 vs Scott Waites (1097.3397698171) | 950 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24518380692429 vs Scott Waites (1097.3397698171) | 950 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.36122036559542 vs Scott Waites (1049.0315334603) | 927 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.36122036559542 vs Scott Waites (1049.0315334603) | 927 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.39646368147382 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 966 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.39646368147382 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 966 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.3518205303691 vs Scott Waites (1072.1496368584) | 975 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.3518205303691 vs Scott Waites (1072.1496368584) | 975 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.37644924604861 vs Scott Waites (1062.666150802) | 951 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.37644924604861 vs Scott Waites (1062.666150802) | 951 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.3139986168259 vs Scott Waites (1086.7589025491) | 931 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.3139986168259 vs Scott Waites (1086.7589025491) | 931 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.26652964929881 vs Scott Waites (1106.854814026) | 978 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.26652964929881 vs Scott Waites (1106.854814026) | 978 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.38425477535954 vs Scott Waites (1059.9127115811) | 953 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.38425477535954 vs Scott Waites (1059.9127115811) | 953 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.3192971419007 vs Scott Waites (1084.5050172041) | 933 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.3192971419007 vs Scott Waites (1084.5050172041) | 933 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.27095822057505 vs Scott Waites (1104.9400342858) | 980 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.27095822057505 vs Scott Waites (1104.9400342858) | 980 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 980. expected: 0.38921247798798 vs Scott Waites (1058.2813604026) | 955 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 980. expected: 0.38921247798798 vs Scott Waites (1058.2813604026) | 955 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.32345773221942 vs Scott Waites (1083.1909589938) | 998 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.32345773221942 vs Scott Waites (1083.1909589938) | 998 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.44000267558935 vs Scott Waites (1039.8922538558) | 970 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.44000267558935 vs Scott Waites (1039.8922538558) | 970 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.36252187835924 vs Scott Waites (1068.0524250936) | 947 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.36252187835924 vs Scott Waites (1068.0524250936) | 947 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30356223896807 vs Scott Waites (1091.2538253085) | 992 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30356223896807 vs Scott Waites (1091.2538253085) | 992 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.42194993979179 vs Scott Waites (1046.6818086025) | 1029 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.42194993979179 vs Scott Waites (1046.6818086025) | 1029 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1029. expected: 0.52776561663407 vs Scott Waites (1009.6866047492) | 1059 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.33821522542208 vs Scott Waites (1077.6094467905) | 1003 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.33821522542208 vs Scott Waites (1077.6094467905) | 1003 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1029. expected: 0.52776561663407 vs Scott Waites (1009.6866047492) | 1059 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1059. expected: 0.61250360870923 vs Scott Waites (979.46360421376) | 1084 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1059. expected: 0.61250360870923 vs Scott Waites (979.46360421376) | 1084 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1084. expected: 0.67798320480831 vs Scott Waites (954.66383517115) | 1105 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1084. expected: 0.67798320480831 vs Scott Waites (954.66383517115) | 1105 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1105. expected: 0.72790908527048 vs Scott Waites (934.05476027888) | 1090 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1105. expected: 0.72790908527048 vs Scott Waites (934.05476027888) | 1090 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1090. expected: 0.69290338113286 vs Scott Waites (948.64094173619) | 1110 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1090. expected: 0.69290338113286 vs Scott Waites (948.64094173619) | 1110 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45371390722023 vs Scott Waites (1035.2552212175) | 974 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45371390722023 vs Scott Waites (1035.2552212175) | 974 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1110. expected: 0.73923494830377 vs Scott Waites (928.9867581287) | 1127 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1110. expected: 0.73923494830377 vs Scott Waites (928.9867581287) | 1127 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1127. expected: 0.77485394746221 vs Scott Waites (912.29779482014) | 1077 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1127. expected: 0.77485394746221 vs Scott Waites (912.29779482014) | 1077 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1077. expected: 0.65985213732873 vs Scott Waites (961.88844745772) | 1035 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1077. expected: 0.65985213732873 vs Scott Waites (961.88844745772) | 1035 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.5443246918155 vs Scott Waites (1004.1189842468) | 1064 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.5443246918155 vs Scott Waites (1004.1189842468) | 1064 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37290653637589 vs Scott Waites (1064.2929112796) | 1014 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37290653637589 vs Scott Waites (1064.2929112796) | 1014 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.48538429013739 vs Scott Waites (1024.1589296077) | 983 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.48538429013739 vs Scott Waites (1024.1589296077) | 983 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.39753369867915 vs Scott Waites (1055.2235241765) | 958 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.39753369867915 vs Scott Waites (1055.2235241765) | 958 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.3304566514275 vs Scott Waites (1080.6656808919) | 1001 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.3304566514275 vs Scott Waites (1080.6656808919) | 1001 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44721649228978 vs Scott Waites (1037.8149065833) | 1036 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44721649228978 vs Scott Waites (1037.8149065833) | 1036 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54815168979185 vs Scott Waites (1002.4367620898) | 1001 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54815168979185 vs Scott Waites (1002.4367620898) | 1001 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44763838211533 vs Scott Waites (1037.5184702365) | 1036 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44763838211533 vs Scott Waites (1037.5184702365) | 1036 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54853581362039 vs Scott Waites (1002.1673266919) | 1001 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54853581362039 vs Scott Waites (1002.1673266919) | 1001 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44798691295292 vs Scott Waites (1037.2736187636) | 1036 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44798691295292 vs Scott Waites (1037.2736187636) | 1036 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.5488530447101 vs Scott Waites (1001.9447811926) | 1001 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.5488530447101 vs Scott Waites (1001.9447811926) | 1001 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44827483142146 vs Scott Waites (1037.071376054) | 1036 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44827483142146 vs Scott Waites (1037.071376054) | 1036 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54911503817356 vs Scott Waites (1001.760965265) | 1001 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54911503817356 vs Scott Waites (1001.760965265) | 1001 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44851267235322 vs Scott Waites (1036.9043277081) | 972 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44851267235322 vs Scott Waites (1036.9043277081) | 972 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.36845339256285 vs Scott Waites (1065.6091387387) | 948 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.36845339256285 vs Scott Waites (1065.6091387387) | 948 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.30730354753612 vs Scott Waites (1089.1901558627) | 928 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.30730354753612 vs Scott Waites (1089.1901558627) | 928 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.26093781631027 vs Scott Waites (1108.8575829051) | 911 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.26093781631027 vs Scott Waites (1108.8575829051) | 911 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.22529130169605 vs Scott Waites (1125.5576031489) | 961 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.22529130169605 vs Scott Waites (1125.5576031489) | 961 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.34032270293502 vs Scott Waites (1075.9762464575) | 939 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.34032270293502 vs Scott Waites (1075.9762464575) | 939 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.28620689865329 vs Scott Waites (1097.7568994453) | 985 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.28620689865329 vs Scott Waites (1097.7568994453) | 985 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40465413862261 vs Scott Waites (1052.0741409591) | 1023 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40465413862261 vs Scott Waites (1052.0741409591) | 1023 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51298940463522 vs Scott Waites (1013.972005831) | 1054 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51298940463522 vs Scott Waites (1013.972005831) | 1054 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60104975076747 vs Scott Waites (982.80332772761) | 1016 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60104975076747 vs Scott Waites (982.80332772761) | 1016 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49241570560455 vs Scott Waites (1021.2705117767) | 1048 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49241570560455 vs Scott Waites (1021.2705117767) | 1048 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.58440142007916 vs Scott Waites (988.78511693542) | 1075 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.58440142007916 vs Scott Waites (988.78511693542) | 1075 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.65687635395091 vs Scott Waites (962.18680782049) | 1097 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.65687635395091 vs Scott Waites (962.18680782049) | 1097 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1097. expected: 0.71145447108649 vs Scott Waites (940.22689447334) | 1115 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1097. expected: 0.71145447108649 vs Scott Waites (940.22689447334) | 1115 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1115. expected: 0.7525723589063 vs Scott Waites (921.75998062288) | 1067 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1115. expected: 0.7525723589063 vs Scott Waites (921.75998062288) | 1067 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.63617735059414 vs Scott Waites (969.92461159288) | 1026 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.63617735059414 vs Scott Waites (969.92461159288) | 1026 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52209048145074 vs Scott Waites (1010.6399620309) | 1057 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52209048145074 vs Scott Waites (1010.6399620309) | 1057 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60895892285133 vs Scott Waites (980.05375284376) | 1082 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60895892285133 vs Scott Waites (980.05375284376) | 1082 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1082. expected: 0.67500594958133 vs Scott Waites (955.02712390624) | 1039 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1082. expected: 0.67500594958133 vs Scott Waites (955.02712390624) | 1039 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55840845635806 vs Scott Waites (998.22750467945) | 1003 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55840845635806 vs Scott Waites (998.22750467945) | 1003 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45555447537702 vs Scott Waites (1033.9656458864) | 974 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45555447537702 vs Scott Waites (1033.9656458864) | 974 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.3744852541246 vs Scott Waites (1063.1211323105) | 950 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.3744852541246 vs Scott Waites (1063.1211323105) | 950 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31235270311287 vs Scott Waites (1087.0881885745) | 994 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31235270311287 vs Scott Waites (1087.0881885745) | 994 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.42983605788696 vs Scott Waites (1043.0787615737) | 966 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.42983605788696 vs Scott Waites (1043.0787615737) | 966 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.69619312291569 vs Dan Best (821.94714861381) | 985 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49582347329175 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.90221550516) | 953 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49582347329175 vs Mike Bistodeau (987.90221550516) | 953 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.7257718596818 vs Dan Best (783.92475727469) | 971 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.51362676670557 vs Roy Connelly (961.52880727159) | 1002 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.48589736899241 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 971 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.48589736899241 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 971 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.45836229728524 vs David Longstreet (1000) | 942 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.41729811503577 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 915 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.41729811503577 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 915 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.28994769870135 vs Scott Waites (1070.5882692785) | 896 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.28994769870135 vs Scott Waites (1070.5882692785) | 896 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.24752958957863 vs Scott Waites (1089.1449219953) | 944 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.24752958957863 vs Scott Waites (1089.1449219953) | 944 |
| 2013-09-07 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.37777947258887 vs Christopher Brackney (1030.6823914695) | 920 |
| 2013-09-20 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.35631949054751 vs Christopher Brackney (1022.7323120821) | 897 |
| 2013-09-27 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 897.19555260496] expected: 0.6646071034134 vs Chris Brackney (1016) | 876 |
| 2013-10-04 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.24555991428204 vs Christopher Brackney (1070.9869130532) | 860 |
| 2013-10-11 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.28466021999093 vs Christopher Brackney (1020.0742384638) | 842 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 842. expected: 0.24131927471953 vs Scott Waites (1040.9868157284) | 827 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 842. expected: 0.24131927471953 vs Scott Waites (1040.9868157284) | 827 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21069978705939 vs Scott Waites (1056.4312493104) | 814 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21069978705939 vs Scott Waites (1056.4312493104) | 814 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.18646109746613 vs Scott Waites (1069.9160356822) | 802 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.18646109746613 vs Scott Waites (1069.9160356822) | 802 |
| 2014-01-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 802.06648976217] expected: 0.7954576327749 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 789 |
| 2014-01-17 | Rated: 789. expected: 0.22063357395394 vs Christopher Brackney (1008.2280372358) | 839 |
| 2014-01-31 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 838.87945126695] expected: 0.6650125845815 vs Chris Brackney (958) | 881 |
| 2014-02-07 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.45059970428691 vs Christopher Brackney (915.43919458678) | 852 |
| 2014-02-21 | Rated: 852. expected: 0.31912529470119 vs Christopher Brackney (983.6423885753) | 832 |
| 2014-02-22 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 831.57598113912] expected: 0.72959178189864 vs Chris Brackney (1004) | 814 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17626418731047 vs Scott Waites (1081.8495459201) | 867 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17626418731047 vs Scott Waites (1081.8495459201) | 867 |
| 2014-02-28 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.29146955665243 vs Christopher Brackney (1021.3061259585) | 848 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1064. expected: 0.62541105022259 vs Scott Waites (974.95576452295) | 1024 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1064. expected: 0.62541105022259 vs Scott Waites (974.95576452295) | 1024 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.51297492839738 vs Scott Waites (1014.9820717372) | 1055 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.51297492839738 vs Scott Waites (1014.9820717372) | 1055 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1055. expected: 0.60103713521897 vs Scott Waites (983.81246715463) | 1017 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1055. expected: 0.60103713521897 vs Scott Waites (983.81246715463) | 1017 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.49240371761003 vs Scott Waites (1022.2788438086) | 985 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.49240371761003 vs Scott Waites (1022.2788438086) | 985 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40227315789955 vs Scott Waites (1053.7926817357) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40227315789955 vs Scott Waites (1053.7926817357) | 1023 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51073679468502 vs Scott Waites (1015.5381638413) | 1054 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51073679468502 vs Scott Waites (1015.5381638413) | 1054 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.5990853113027 vs Scott Waites (984.2253187011) | 1016 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.5990853113027 vs Scott Waites (984.2253187011) | 1016 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49055077107115 vs Scott Waites (1022.5667786245) | 985 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49055077107115 vs Scott Waites (1022.5667786245) | 985 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40203878161988 vs Scott Waites (1053.962027973) | 1023 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40203878161988 vs Scott Waites (1053.962027973) | 1023 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51051477303251 vs Scott Waites (1015.6925099967) | 990 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51051477303251 vs Scott Waites (1015.6925099967) | 990 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.41678666019002 vs Scott Waites (1048.3654554708) | 1027 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.41678666019002 vs Scott Waites (1048.3654554708) | 1027 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.52295242901682 vs Scott Waites (1011.0398017229) | 1058 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.52295242901682 vs Scott Waites (1011.0398017229) | 1058 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.60970573321661 vs Scott Waites (980.50875718001) | 1019 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.60970573321661 vs Scott Waites (980.50875718001) | 1019 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.49923737849975 vs Scott Waites (1019.5299241059) | 987 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.49923737849975 vs Scott Waites (1019.5299241059) | 987 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.40825516344757 vs Scott Waites (1051.4811163299) | 961 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.40825516344757 vs Scott Waites (1051.4811163299) | 961 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26063500789008 vs Scott Waites (1029.1304539079) | 895 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26063500789008 vs Scott Waites (1029.1304539079) | 895 |
| 2014-09-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 895.31935949503] expected: 0.69451981759545 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 876 |
| 2014-09-12 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.30842930538151 vs Christopher Brackney (1016.2723783713) | 856 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.33821522542208 vs Scott Waites (1077.6094467905) | 1003 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.33821522542208 vs Scott Waites (1077.6094467905) | 1003 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32646287592916 vs Scott Waites (981.81109441289) | 899 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32646287592916 vs Scott Waites (981.81109441289) | 899 |
| 2014-10-03 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 899.10637594053] expected: 0.72095506816714 vs Chris Brackney (1064) | 881 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45371390722023 vs Scott Waites (1035.2552212175) | 974 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45371390722023 vs Scott Waites (1035.2552212175) | 974 |
| 2014-10-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 881.24750030323] expected: 0.76053671527965 vs Chris Brackney (1082) | 866 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37290653637589 vs Scott Waites (1064.2929112796) | 1014 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37290653637589 vs Scott Waites (1064.2929112796) | 1014 |
| 2014-10-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 865.92185008113] expected: 0.79087251748231 vs Chris Brackney (1097) | 853 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.48538429013739 vs Scott Waites (1024.1589296077) | 983 |
| 2014-10-17 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.18518250270805 vs Christopher Brackney (1110.3841588811) | 841 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.48538429013739 vs Scott Waites (1024.1589296077) | 983 |
| 2014-10-24 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.16535336874223 vs Christopher Brackney (1122.2358390544) | 830 |
| 2014-10-24 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 830.4173844005] expected: 0.85091625871148 vs Chris Brackney (1133) | 821 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.39753369867915 vs Scott Waites (1055.2235241765) | 958 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.39753369867915 vs Scott Waites (1055.2235241765) | 958 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.3304566514275 vs Scott Waites (1080.6656808919) | 1001 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.3304566514275 vs Scott Waites (1080.6656808919) | 1001 |
| 2014-11-07 | Rated: 821. expected: 0.16947238951884 vs Christopher Brackney (1097.1020487957) | 810 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44721649228978 vs Scott Waites (1037.8149065833) | 1036 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44721649228978 vs Scott Waites (1037.8149065833) | 1036 |
| 2014-11-14 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 810.15376707079] expected: 0.84742431195531 vs Chris Brackney (1108) | 800 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54815168979185 vs Scott Waites (1002.4367620898) | 1001 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54815168979185 vs Scott Waites (1002.4367620898) | 1001 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44763838211533 vs Scott Waites (1037.5184702365) | 1036 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44763838211533 vs Scott Waites (1037.5184702365) | 1036 |
| 2014-11-21 | Rated: 800. expected: 0.12263365319435 vs Christopher Brackney (1141.8285225043) | 792 |
| 2014-12-05 | Rated: 792. expected: 0.11315067499007 vs Christopher Brackney (1149.6770763087) | 849 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54853581362039 vs Scott Waites (1002.1673266919) | 1001 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54853581362039 vs Scott Waites (1002.1673266919) | 1001 |
| 2014-12-12 | Rated: 849. expected: 0.19716488178011 vs Christopher Brackney (1092.9187195081) | 900 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44798691295292 vs Scott Waites (1037.2736187636) | 1036 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44798691295292 vs Scott Waites (1037.2736187636) | 1036 |
| 2014-12-19 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 900.38144756607] expected: 0.69322114595118 vs Chris Brackney (1042) | 881 |
| 2014-12-19 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.26118626901352 vs Christopher Brackney (1061.6338466591) | 864 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.5488530447101 vs Scott Waites (1001.9447811926) | 1001 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.5488530447101 vs Scott Waites (1001.9447811926) | 1001 |
| 2015-01-09 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.22550018345551 vs Christopher Brackney (1078.349767876) | 850 |
| 2015-01-16 | Rated: 850. expected: 0.19820291007119 vs Christopher Brackney (1092.7817796171) | 837 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44827483142146 vs Scott Waites (1037.071376054) | 1036 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44827483142146 vs Scott Waites (1037.071376054) | 1036 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.35767735066445 vs Scott Waites (938.70471847236) | 878 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.35767735066445 vs Scott Waites (938.70471847236) | 878 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54911503817356 vs Scott Waites (1001.760965265) | 1001 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.54911503817356 vs Scott Waites (1001.760965265) | 1001 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44851267235322 vs Scott Waites (1036.9043277081) | 972 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.44851267235322 vs Scott Waites (1036.9043277081) | 972 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.22587750877386 vs Robert Zinselmeyer (1091.9746785387) | 928 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.37627662145874 vs Rick Salisbury (1015.7939147146) | 904 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.31385391157007 vs Rick Salisbury (1039.875618488) | 884 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 884. expected: 0.33900090875364 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 926 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 884. expected: 0.33900090875364 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 926 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.36845339256285 vs Scott Waites (1065.6091387387) | 948 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.36845339256285 vs Scott Waites (1065.6091387387) | 948 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.30730354753612 vs Scott Waites (1089.1901558627) | 928 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.30730354753612 vs Scott Waites (1089.1901558627) | 928 |
| 2015-04-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 926.30394183977] expected: 0.73665548309162 vs Chris Brackney (1105) | 909 |
| 2015-05-01 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.22700748043441 vs Christopher Brackney (1121.8540490821) | 894 |
| 2015-05-01 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 894.4715212522] expected: 0.80064806278027 vs Chris Brackney (1136) | 882 |
| 2015-05-08 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.1771779295197 vs Christopher Brackney (1148.7585239821) | 871 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.26093781631027 vs Scott Waites (1108.8575829051) | 911 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.26093781631027 vs Scott Waites (1108.8575829051) | 911 |
| 2015-05-30 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.15920149821242 vs Christopher Brackney (1160.0979114713) | 861 |
| 2015-05-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 860.81110411441] expected: 0.85567641108362 vs Chris Brackney (1170) | 852 |
| 2015-06-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 851.57439442376] expected: 0.86816301398196 vs Chris Brackney (1179) | 843 |
| 2015-06-05 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.12102684049267 vs Christopher Brackney (1187.4375671052) | 835 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.22529130169605 vs Scott Waites (1125.5576031489) | 961 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.22529130169605 vs Scott Waites (1125.5576031489) | 961 |
| 2015-06-25 | Rated: 835. expected: 0.32451869923019 vs Jim Ferrell (962.34944180076) | 814 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.34032270293502 vs Scott Waites (1075.9762464575) | 939 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.34032270293502 vs Scott Waites (1075.9762464575) | 939 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.38196463492017 vs Scott Waites (897.59606891488) | 854 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.38196463492017 vs Scott Waites (897.59606891488) | 854 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.28620689865329 vs Scott Waites (1097.7568994453) | 985 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.28620689865329 vs Scott Waites (1097.7568994453) | 985 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 854. expected: 0.4941836366239 vs Scott Waites (858.04180554977) | 886 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 854. expected: 0.4941836366239 vs Scott Waites (858.04180554977) | 886 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.58596024236112 vs Scott Waites (825.6695582937) | 848 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.58596024236112 vs Scott Waites (825.6695582937) | 848 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40465413862261 vs Scott Waites (1052.0741409591) | 1023 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.40465413862261 vs Scott Waites (1052.0741409591) | 1023 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47818102170148 vs Scott Waites (863.17101380482) | 881 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47818102170148 vs Scott Waites (863.17101380482) | 881 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51298940463522 vs Scott Waites (1013.972005831) | 1054 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51298940463522 vs Scott Waites (1013.972005831) | 1054 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60104975076747 vs Scott Waites (982.80332772761) | 1016 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60104975076747 vs Scott Waites (982.80332772761) | 1016 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54338844529807 vs Scott Waites (829.77459919371) | 857 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54338844529807 vs Scott Waites (829.77459919371) | 857 |
| 2015-10-23 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.19209930895519 vs Christopher Brackney (1106.5328708181) | 877 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49241570560455 vs Scott Waites (1021.2705117767) | 1048 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49241570560455 vs Scott Waites (1021.2705117767) | 1048 |
| 2015-11-04 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.27090827690076 vs Scott Holst (1048.9839576094) | 924 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.58440142007916 vs Scott Waites (988.78511693542) | 1075 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.58440142007916 vs Scott Waites (988.78511693542) | 1075 |
| 2015-11-09 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.38915674619887 vs Scott Holst (1002.3220873311) | 899 |
| 2015-11-23 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.32341092330475 vs Scott Holst (1027.2281190878) | 878 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.65687635395091 vs Scott Waites (962.18680782049) | 1097 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.65687635395091 vs Scott Waites (962.18680782049) | 1097 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1097. expected: 0.71145447108649 vs Scott Waites (940.22689447334) | 1115 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1097. expected: 0.71145447108649 vs Scott Waites (940.22689447334) | 1115 |
| 2015-12-14 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.27325403502964 vs Scott Holst (1047.9264181793) | 893 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58612516688928 vs Scott Waites (832.55145969279) | 855 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58612516688928 vs Scott Waites (832.55145969279) | 855 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1115. expected: 0.7525723589063 vs Scott Waites (921.75998062288) | 1067 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1115. expected: 0.7525723589063 vs Scott Waites (921.75998062288) | 1067 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.47833549650226 vs Scott Waites (870.0634703737) | 824 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.47833549650226 vs Scott Waites (870.0634703737) | 824 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.63617735059414 vs Scott Waites (969.92461159288) | 1026 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.63617735059414 vs Scott Waites (969.92461159288) | 1026 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14793115592366 vs Jim Burris (1112.1660139179) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14793115592366 vs Jim Burris (1112.1660139179) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25121228159508 vs Richard Burton (988.72713782436) | 783 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25121228159508 vs Richard Burton (988.72713782436) | 783 |
| 2016-03-19 | Rated: 783. expected: 0.20463933897899 vs Alex Key (1018.8299929784) | 834 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52209048145074 vs Scott Waites (1010.6399620309) | 1057 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52209048145074 vs Scott Waites (1010.6399620309) | 1057 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 834. expected: 0.40520508769973 vs Scott Waites (900.67694214984) | 872 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 834. expected: 0.40520508769973 vs Scott Waites (900.67694214984) | 872 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 872. expected: 0.51350990957595 vs Scott Waites (862.61006776263) | 903 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 872. expected: 0.51350990957595 vs Scott Waites (862.61006776263) | 903 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60895892285133 vs Scott Waites (980.05375284376) | 1082 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60895892285133 vs Scott Waites (980.05375284376) | 1082 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1082. expected: 0.67500594958133 vs Scott Waites (955.02712390624) | 1039 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1082. expected: 0.67500594958133 vs Scott Waites (955.02712390624) | 1039 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.60150327793973 vs Scott Waites (831.47470197549) | 865 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.60150327793973 vs Scott Waites (831.47470197549) | 865 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49284677100992 vs Scott Waites (869.97091176363) | 897 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.49284677100992 vs Scott Waites (869.97091176363) | 897 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55840845635806 vs Scott Waites (998.22750467945) | 1003 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55840845635806 vs Scott Waites (998.22750467945) | 1003 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.58478167191736 vs Scott Waites (837.51310510827) | 860 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.58478167191736 vs Scott Waites (837.51310510827) | 860 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45555447537702 vs Scott Waites (1033.9656458864) | 974 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.45555447537702 vs Scott Waites (1033.9656458864) | 974 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.47851410047092 vs Scott Waites (874.93913211098) | 893 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.47851410047092 vs Scott Waites (874.93913211098) | 893 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.57348621652601 vs Scott Waites (841.56403454112) | 856 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.57348621652601 vs Scott Waites (841.56403454112) | 856 |
| 2016-08-27 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.19111063356203 vs Dan Best (1106.6417096082) | 844 |
| 2016-09-10 | Rated: 844. expected: 0.16104699574433 vs Dan Best (1130.7140023617) | 834 |
| 2016-09-16 | Rated: 834. expected: 0.14587156865199 vs Dan Best (1141.0210100894) | 825 |
| 2016-09-24 | Rated: 825. expected: 0.1332060353675 vs Dan Best (1150.3567904831) | 880 |
| 2016-09-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 880.47481373648] expected: 0.77467612722826 vs Danno (1095) | 930 |
| 2016-10-08 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.2750736650991 vs Dan Best (1098.33794516) | 912 |
| 2016-10-22 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.23613483339264 vs Dan Best (1115.9426597263) | 897 |
| 2016-10-29 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.20630713707053 vs Dan Best (1131.0552890634) | 948 |
| 2016-11-19 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.33782640792977 vs Dan Best (1064.9113045568) | 990 |
| 2016-11-25 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.45331875545345 vs Dan Best (1022.5321946643) | 1025 |
| 2016-12-03 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.55369480826388 vs Dan Best (987.54459501333) | 990 |
| 2016-12-10 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.45267849060698 vs Dan Best (1022.9810627422) | 961 |
| 2016-12-17 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.37201909020052 vs Dan Best (1051.9524861411) | 1001 |
| 2017-01-07 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.57253993889715 vs Dan Best (950.23590247182) | 1028 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.7030640539319 vs Scott Waites (878.26715239878) | 983 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.7030640539319 vs Scott Waites (878.26715239878) | 983 |
| 2017-01-21 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.58566846624974 vs Dan Best (922.87845856124) | 946 |
| 2017-01-28 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.47934427635492 vs Dan Best (960.36124040122) | 979 |
| 2017-02-04 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.57422493017708 vs Dan Best (927.03927408793) | 942 |
| 2017-02-19 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.46729296922571 vs Dan Best (964.75967277685) | 976 |
| 2017-02-25 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.64552013151667 vs Dan Best (871.87271398163) | 935 |
| 2017-03-02 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.64662486715781 vs Tom Abromaitis (830.03343302534) | 958 |
| 2017-03-04 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.56413723385557 vs Dan Best (913.1860023987) | 922 |
| 2017-03-04 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 921.89521703324] expected: 0.53892797633259 vs Danno (949) | 892 |
| 2017-03-16 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 892.38660751853] expected: 0.57654923655717 vs Danno (946) | 929 |
| 2017-03-16 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.26735808922988 vs Dave Mareske (1104.1193720517) | 976 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.46551605527317 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 946 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.46551605527317 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 946 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.38169702080615 vs Colman Quill (1029.7930275375) | 986 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.38169702080615 vs Colman Quill (1029.7930275375) | 986 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.4729642217817 vs Richard Burton (1004.8047238464) | 1020 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.4729642217817 vs Richard Burton (1004.8047238464) | 1020 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 1020. expected: 0.55809479519647 vs Francis Biss (979.44845778392) | 984 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.50992543265935 vs Jeff Ital (977.10219684743) | 951 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.53983180554199 vs Scott Waites (923.26325185042) | 948 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.53983180554199 vs Scott Waites (923.26325185042) | 948 |
| 2017-04-08 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.58432728611624 vs Dan Best (888.8381400234) | 911 |
| 2017-04-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.47808899024896 vs Dan Best (926.23508633484) | 880 |
| 2017-04-29 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.42619902309172 vs Dan Best (931.65953335641) | 917 |
| 2017-05-06 | Rated: 917. expected: 0.53170964365874 vs Dan Best (894.93627083428) | 947 |
| 2017-05-13 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.63742043982848 vs Dan Best (848.99093286178) | 906 |
| 2017-06-03 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.47767480933467 vs Dan Best (921.52345301626) | 939 |
| 2017-06-10 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.57273894009334 vs Dan Best (888.09464081368) | 966 |
| 2017-07-01 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.72734288962928 vs Dan Best (795.55105204916) | 919 |
| 2017-07-08 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.53901789864571 vs Dan Best (891.83235066167) | 949 |
| 2017-07-15 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.62220444179018 vs Dan Best (862.32949617499) | 909 |
| 2017-07-22 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.4458162131724 vs Dan Best (946.7991829386) | 944 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.40650922828221 vs Jeff Ital (1009.7374245376) | 918 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21851991875566 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.3707530426) | 904 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21851991875566 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.3707530426) | 904 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.22685325880375 vs Rick Reinesch (1117.0067629137) | 889 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.58261203505874 vs Dan Best (831.06418829129) | 916 |
| 2017-08-05 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.52703023526846 vs Dan Best (897.19913908146) | 882 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.43728086014451 vs Scott Waites (925.81248740511) | 918 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.43728086014451 vs Scott Waites (925.81248740511) | 918 |
| 2017-08-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.40767753372917 vs Dan Best (982.89657053044) | 956 |
| 2017-09-09 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.51584233410588 vs Dan Best (944.9879326891) | 923 |
| 2017-09-16 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39548821819328 vs Dan Best (996.70848777065) | 898 |
| 2017-09-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.42665218119993 vs Dan Best (949.33767776258) | 935 |
| 2017-10-07 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.40562118903975 vs Dan Best (1001.3770740143) | 909 |
| 2017-10-08 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38123052408875 vs Dan Best (993.13648621664) | 949 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58438276146876 vs Scott Waites (889.79846245436) | 912 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58438276146876 vs Scott Waites (889.79846245436) | 912 |
| 2017-10-14 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.40220485393056 vs Dan Best (980.84203075068) | 950 |
| 2017-10-21 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.45664312868 vs Dan Best (980.20329461561) | 921 |
| 2017-10-28 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.4400007213499 vs Dan Best (962.89363163946) | 957 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.54278227696245 vs Scott Waites (927.19895918836) | 922 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.54278227696245 vs Scott Waites (927.19895918836) | 922 |
| 2017-11-04 | Rated: 922. expected: 0.46212088994867 vs Dan Best (948.37163064399) | 892 |
| 2017-11-11 | Rated: 892. expected: 0.4912898901184 vs Dan Best (898.0530165939) | 861 |
| 2017-11-18 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.34667011934468 vs Dan Best (971.08644461281) | 839 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 839. expected: 0.33011114664066 vs Scott Waites (961.93702491396) | 818 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 839. expected: 0.33011114664066 vs Scott Waites (961.93702491396) | 818 |
| 2017-12-02 | Rated: 818. expected: 0.2671845252156 vs Dan Best (993.27333225087) | 801 |
| 2017-12-09 | Rated: 801. expected: 0.23054282028932 vs Dan Best (1010.3731418647) | 786 |
| 2017-12-16 | Rated: 786. expected: 0.20156675559432 vs Dan Best (1025.1278823632) | 773 |
| 2017-12-30 | Rated: 773. expected: 0.29118018232903 vs Dan Best (927.54961508387) | 754 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 754. expected: 0.21105144858678 vs Scott Waites (983.06413829896) | 804 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 754. expected: 0.21105144858678 vs Scott Waites (983.06413829896) | 804 |
| 2018-01-06 | Rated: 804. expected: 0.28923984411581 vs Dan Best (960.18598205475) | 785 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.29953996947862 vs Scott Waites (932.57143100851) | 830 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.29953996947862 vs Scott Waites (932.57143100851) | 830 |
| 2018-01-13 | Rated: 830. expected: 0.28303496097888 vs Dan Best (991.46315810272) | 876 |
| 2018-01-20 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.23678728557823 vs Dave Mareske (1079.3148870815) | 861 |
| 2018-01-27 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.38063198783343 vs Dan Best (945.57739560537) | 837 |
| 2018-02-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.31750714460006 vs Dan Best (969.93784282671) | 817 |
| 2018-02-10 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.2694617879784 vs Dan Best (990.25830008111) | 864 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46588561557952 vs Scott Waites (887.74198905514) | 898 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46588561557952 vs Scott Waites (887.74198905514) | 898 |
| 2018-02-24 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.46573584153065 vs Dan Best (921.84655162003) | 932 |
| 2018-03-03 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.56347520110886 vs Dan Best (887.65364547799) | 896 |
| 2018-03-10 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.46019778065396 vs Dan Best (923.71605834896) | 867 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.42147865350092 vs Justin Williamson (922.01752176233) | 904 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.42147865350092 vs Justin Williamson (922.01752176233) | 904 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.53369406529745 vs Dan Best (880.55142772992) | 934 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.34921208841171 vs Burnie Hegdahl (1042.1400833455) | 976 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.28662264012659 vs Jim Burris (1134.403532071) | 958 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.28662264012659 vs Jim Burris (1134.403532071) | 958 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.43475141769893 vs Mike Bistodeau (1003.5993899518) | 930 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.43475141769893 vs Mike Bistodeau (1003.5993899518) | 930 |
| 2018-03-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.46312362843088 vs Dan Best (955.67094061692) | 900 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.56643922097598 vs Scott Waites (853.55866845223) | 864 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.56643922097598 vs Scott Waites (853.55866845223) | 864 |
| 2018-04-07 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.36834969475922 vs Dan Best (957.68655841687) | 904 |
| 2018-04-14 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48092523668875 vs Dan Best (917.26093888146) | 937 |
| 2018-04-21 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.61410553830665 vs Dan Best (856.29021263882) | 962 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.60241900793596 vs Scott Waites (889.8107785947) | 987 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.60241900793596 vs Scott Waites (889.8107785947) | 987 |
| 2018-04-28 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.64852773743337 vs Dan Best (880.58500063882) | 945 |
| 2018-05-05 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.55469318845432 vs Dan Best (906.84260217465) | 909 |
| 2018-05-12 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45216238583051 vs Dan Best (942.34296623573) | 944 |
| 2018-06-02 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.5526465104116 vs Dan Best (907.28135892888) | 909 |
| 2018-06-09 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45172356176393 vs Dan Best (942.65073559522) | 944 |
| 2018-06-16 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.59803116326384 vs Dan Best (874.98742778704) | 970 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.6475028173761 vs Scott Waites (864.3655951026) | 929 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.6475028173761 vs Scott Waites (864.3655951026) | 929 |
| 2018-06-23 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.61277980480892 vs Dan Best (849.26142223593) | 954 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.5689156146231 vs Scott Waites (905.80577541467) | 982 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.5689156146231 vs Scott Waites (905.80577541467) | 982 |
| 2018-07-14 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.2560920912484 vs Dave Mareske (1167.2492037104) | 966 |
| 2018-07-21 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.64946155205271 vs Dan Best (858.87288535289) | 924 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.31230535935205 vs David Ginnard (1061.1264811002) | 904 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.43185740552678 vs Richard Trippeer (951.64679154744) | 940 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.52712545497889 vs Dan Best (921.13277902622) | 970 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.61194985143172 vs Dan Best (890.86880814487) | 931 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32901346699117 vs Craig Walters (1054.8000516681) | 974 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32901346699117 vs Craig Walters (1054.8000516681) | 974 |
| 2018-08-04 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.50745614751715 vs Dan Best (968.81855394314) | 942 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59077450547138 vs Scott Waites (878.21637475054) | 904 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59077450547138 vs Scott Waites (878.21637475054) | 904 |
| 2018-08-11 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.36352910128209 vs Dan Best (1001.2957473842) | 945 |
| 2018-09-08 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.63777606548479 vs Dan Best (846.72357065759) | 904 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48270018504341 vs Scott Waites (916.02594310071) | 873 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48270018504341 vs Scott Waites (916.02594310071) | 873 |
| 2018-10-20 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.47908568540845 vs Dan Best (887.54123884862) | 906 |
| 2018-10-27 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.57399487630621 vs Dan Best (854.20272271476) | 933 |
| 2018-11-03 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.64806390002669 vs Dan Best (826.93839479836) | 892 |
| 2018-11-10 | Rated: 892. expected: 0.53389024241069 vs Dan Best (868.41448440007) | 922 |
| 2018-11-17 | Rated: 922. expected: 0.61779137098307 vs Dan Best (838.58345991435) | 946 |
| 2018-12-01 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.68116919861363 vs Dan Best (814.12210765727) | 966 |
| 2019-01-05 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.72256070197296 vs Dan Best (799.717455649) | 920 |
| 2019-01-11 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.60496608669871 vs Dan Best (845.96134057527) | 945 |
| 2019-01-12 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.67164800749153 vs Dan Best (820.67917012399) | 902 |
| 2019-01-19 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.55494621427894 vs Dan Best (863.66464260344) | 930 |
| 2019-01-26 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.63316546237523 vs Dan Best (835.1812003173) | 921 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.46276895356108 vs Scott Waites (946.91875494349) | 955 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.46276895356108 vs Scott Waites (946.91875494349) | 955 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.65490546108295 vs Dan Best (843.70378990931) | 913 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 913. expected: 0.53932485344524 vs Dan Best (885.61773941862) | 942 |
| 2019-02-08 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.62111449564336 vs Dan Best (856.13453003911) | 902 |
| 2019-02-16 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.50879804979191 vs Dan Best (895.88585776029) | 869 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 869. expected: 0.43767258107733 vs Scott Waites (912.5359679714) | 841 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 869. expected: 0.43767258107733 vs Scott Waites (912.5359679714) | 841 |
| 2019-02-23 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.28769913801974 vs Dan Best (998.48996368186) | 823 |
| 2019-03-01 | Rated: 823. expected: 0.2467179926407 vs Dan Best (1016.9027085151) | 871 |
| 2019-03-02 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.36300061612122 vs Dan Best (968.69266004413) | 912 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.18932327765092 vs Scott Martin (1164.6574753456) | 900 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.18932327765092 vs Scott Martin (1164.6574753456) | 900 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.35993500019711 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 941 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.35993500019711 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 941 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.24162367862039 vs Rick Reinesch (1139.6981090655) | 926 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.45260036705591 vs Ryan Ellet (959.03584001262) | 961 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.45260036705591 vs Ryan Ellet (959.03584001262) | 961 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.57252493965745 vs Dan Best (910.24654905586) | 988 |
| 2019-03-30 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.64681594927591 vs Dan Best (882.88814519394) | 1011 |
| 2019-04-06 | Rated: 1011. expected: 0.70424375707052 vs Dan Best (860.2843659476) | 966 |
| 2019-04-13 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.58639813053554 vs Dan Best (905.35596640011) | 992 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.57351018295959 vs Scott Waites (940.54701316035) | 1019 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.57351018295959 vs Scott Waites (940.54701316035) | 1019 |
| 2019-04-27 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.65076229017262 vs Dan Best (910.87950110078) | 1041 |
| 2019-05-04 | Rated: 1041. expected: 0.71934699858913 vs Dan Best (877.49250208104) | 1059 |
| 2019-05-11 | Rated: 1059. expected: 0.75918884815116 vs Dan Best (859.53070999075) | 1010 |
| 2019-05-18 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.68627076939117 vs Dan Best (874.0237932911) | 966 |
| 2019-06-01 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.56871887681976 vs Dan Best (917.94512253213) | 930 |
| 2019-06-08 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.4650246330241 vs Dan Best (954.3431306486) | 900 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.48093856365386 vs Scott Waites (913.25166486976) | 933 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.48093856365386 vs Scott Waites (913.25166486976) | 933 |
| 2019-06-29 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.4940688801882 vs Dan Best (937.12155749502) | 901 |
| 2019-07-06 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.47541312739806 vs Dan Best (918.09849957195) | 935 |
| 2019-07-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.57213268694947 vs Dan Best (884.52493972543) | 962 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.61582088820749 vs Scott Waites (880.03173294361) | 987 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.61582088820749 vs Scott Waites (880.03173294361) | 987 |
| 2019-07-20 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.2117115960495 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1215.3761966945) | 973 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.60506521600885 vs Dan Best (898.88927964048) | 934 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.49480000993665 vs Dan Best (937.61345346504) | 966 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.48297639356419 vs Peter Ward (977.83378737939) | 935 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41515811597799 vs Richard Burton (994.52997402683) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41515811597799 vs Richard Burton (994.52997402683) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44526626402214 vs Gary Bradley (1010.1859145975) | 944 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44526626402214 vs Gary Bradley (1010.1859145975) | 944 |
| 2019-08-03 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.64292084043152 vs Dan Best (841.84280007483) | 903 |
| 2019-08-10 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.52876528917782 vs Dan Best (882.98973386244) | 933 |
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.66532814854716 vs Dan Best (813.633315373) | 954 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31745111153956 vs Paul Lauger (1086.9827646662) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31745111153956 vs Paul Lauger (1086.9827646662) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39849485452995 vs Mark Harms (1005.5266514974) | 908 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39849485452995 vs Mark Harms (1005.5266514974) | 908 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.38258611907996 vs Jeff Kouba (991.13887209452) | 948 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.38258611907996 vs Jeff Kouba (991.13887209452) | 948 |
| 2019-09-07 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.20966775006933 vs Dan Best, Paul Works, Dave Mareske (1178.5112276346) | 935 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61253002414813 vs Scott Waites (855.44426978889) | 896 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.61253002414813 vs Scott Waites (855.44426978889) | 896 |
| 2019-09-14 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.52558127087522 vs Dan Best (878.20877803152) | 926 |
| 2019-09-21 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.61061324828417 vs Dan Best (847.84597936754) | 951 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58039584890873 vs Scott Waites (894.64619133437) | 914 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.58039584890873 vs Scott Waites (894.64619133437) | 914 |
| 2019-10-05 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.57880334931086 vs Dan Best (858.7815494062) | 877 |
| 2019-10-18 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.50532084758813 vs Dan Best (873.30255682812) | 845 |
| 2019-10-26 | Rated: 845. expected: 0.41360318536895 vs Dan Best (905.64309107376) | 883 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43024133055104 vs Scott Waites (931.79152566453) | 919 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.43024133055104 vs Scott Waites (931.79152566453) | 919 |
| 2019-11-02 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.57271209912579 vs Dan Best (868.11369493737) | 882 |
| 2019-11-16 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.40952899235111 vs Dan Best (945.56557026214) | 920 |
| 2019-11-23 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.51758532024285 vs Dan Best (907.77542577261) | 919 |
| 2019-12-07 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.51452970102057 vs Dan Best (908.90088626816) | 886 |
| 2019-12-14 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.42033755656346 vs Dan Best (941.83078713347) | 923 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39096739659576 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 962 |
| 2020-01-04 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.63290631892069 vs Dan Best (867.37499088553) | 921 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53687936090265 vs Scott Waites (895.3269708198) | 887 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.53687936090265 vs Scott Waites (895.3269708198) | 887 |
| 2020-01-11 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.46998596089741 vs Dan Best (907.88099529645) | 889 |
| 2020-01-18 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.47561182726545 vs Dan Best (905.96009679389) | 923 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49037746200667 vs Scott Waites (929.68724991756) | 956 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.49037746200667 vs Scott Waites (929.68724991756) | 956 |
| 2020-02-01 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.62749376152594 vs Dan Best (865.40965517563) | 916 |
| 2020-02-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.5150065390772 vs Dan Best (905.56925591329) | 883 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.47976068185937 vs Scott Waites (897.07140748599) | 916 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.47976068185937 vs Scott Waites (897.07140748599) | 916 |
| 2020-02-15 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.46762256137653 vs Dan Best (938.52967441423) | 886 |
| 2020-02-22 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.38351302026523 vs Dan Best (968.45751834233) | 861 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49600496874324 vs Scott Waites (863.77609112499) | 893 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.49600496874324 vs Scott Waites (863.77609112499) | 893 |
| 2020-02-29 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.35993188149608 vs Dan Best (993.00235163931) | 934 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64334677731325 vs Scott Waites (831.52040912456) | 957 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.64334677731325 vs Scott Waites (831.52040912456) | 957 |
| 2020-03-07 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.53305394290928 vs Dan Best (933.99822098197) | 987 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73621899187798 vs Scott Waites (808.69460287261) | 940 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.73621899187798 vs Scott Waites (808.69460287261) | 940 |
| 2020-03-14 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.56107722219848 vs Dan Best (897.34619233792) | 968 |
| 2020-03-20 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.63839878120905 vs Dan Best (869.25513455862) | 927 |
| 2020-03-21 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.52428372027867 vs Dan Best (910.112656556) | 957 |
| 2020-03-25 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.14139433232114 vs Dave Mareske (1270.344699792) | 1012 |
| 2020-03-28 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.68173812428942 vs Dan Best (879.66681465383) | 1032 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73384443506118 vs Scott Waites (855.8126183528) | 985 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.73384443506118 vs Scott Waites (855.8126183528) | 985 |
| 2020-04-04 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.67339895264946 vs Dan Best (859.29805460836) | 942 |
| 2020-04-08 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.55674974408144 vs Dan Best (902.39558757792) | 970 |
| 2020-04-09 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.63470653766891 vs Dan Best (874.02757119913) | 993 |
| 2020-04-10 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.69411733530116 vs Dan Best (850.64878960994) | 949 |
| 2020-04-11 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.57699089934605 vs Dan Best (895.07229906922) | 976 |
| 2020-04-18 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.59162466747802 vs Dan Best (911.60529109162) | 938 |
| 2020-04-23 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.41259990036342 vs Dan Best (999.36195883659) | 976 |
| 2020-04-25 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.29712172144028 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1125.578287878) | 957 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.51692263804784 vs Dan Best (945.23645358484) | 988 |
| 2020-05-02 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.6044732599524 vs Dan Best (914.3195024199) | 949 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.529877182651 vs Dan Best (928.21444464604) | 915 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.51758066841396 vs Scott Waites (902.77866219671) | 946 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.51758066841396 vs Scott Waites (902.77866219671) | 946 |
| 2020-05-09 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.47680863204766 vs Dan Best (962.1265843357) | 979 |
| 2020-05-14 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.58563581962564 vs Dan Best (918.90182958558) | 1006 |
| 2020-05-16 | Rated: 1006. expected: 0.65791911372534 vs Dan Best (892.38252204162) | 996 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.65132355211354 vs Dan Best (887.45033211197) | 1018 |
| 2020-05-22 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.17365628045031 vs Dave Mareske (1288.9880944241) | 1007 |
| 2020-05-23 | Rated: 1007. expected: 0.69352271644605 vs Dan Best (865.13503944724) | 963 |
| 2020-05-25 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.58462510682153 vs Dan Best (903.62511213189) | 926 |