User: lokatt
| Name: | Ingemar Gardell |
| Registered on: | 2020-01-04 11:27:13 |
| Last Login: | 2025-12-07 07:56:50 |
User Notes:
Owns: 677 Scenarios
Played: 85 (77 unique scenarios: 11%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 845 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 6 games lost (From 2020-04-18 to 2020-06-12 [55 days])
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1000] expected: 0.5 vs jacelm (1000) | 1016 |
| 2019-12-01 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.54592192278048 vs Jacob Elmqvist (984) | 1031 |
| 2019-12-08 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1030.530498471] expected: 0.41236478336913 vs jacelm (969) | 1012 |
| 2019-12-10 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1011.7261715388] expected: 0.46590827291905 vs jacelm (988) | 1027 |
| 2019-12-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1026.6352362722] expected: 0.42342006482331 vs jacelm (973) | 1008 |
| 2019-12-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1008.1846783466] expected: 0.47528940757391 vs jacelm (991) | 991 |
| 2019-12-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 991.39393938896] expected: 0.5238798607881 vs jacelm (1008) | 976 |
| 2019-12-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 976.15809493418] expected: 0.56700542703834 vs jacelm (1023) | 994 |
| 2019-12-16 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 994.3022685994] expected: 0.51539040967419 vs jacelm (1005) | 1011 |
| 2019-12-17 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1010.794761709] expected: 0.46867589365874 vs jacelm (989) | 1026 |
| 2019-12-18 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1025.7923903061] expected: 0.42601200260856 vs jacelm (974) | 1039 |
| 2019-12-21 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1039.4247743895] expected: 0.38764890568872 vs jacelm (960) | 1020 |
| 2019-12-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1019.8295393716] expected: 0.44293046935966 vs jacelm (980) | 1034 |
| 2019-12-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1034.0033143911] expected: 0.40336623505647 vs jacelm (966) | 1047 |
| 2019-12-28 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1046.9110339129] expected: 0.36804909562383 vs jacelm (953) | 1027 |
| 2019-12-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1026.6886049728] expected: 0.4233450645122 vs jacelm (973) | 1040 |
| 2020-01-04 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1040.2356470372] expected: 0.38517734998667 vs jacelm (959) | 1021 |
| 2020-01-07 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1020.5613222368] expected: 0.44047212061312 vs jacelm (979) | 1035 |
| 2020-01-11 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 1034.6564300964] expected: 0.40107819375052 vs jacelm (965) | 1015 |
| 2020-01-19 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1015.4909322964] expected: 0.45480460202808 vs jacelm (984) | 1030 |
| 2020-01-25 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1030.0446795613] expected: 0.41304262098055 vs jacelm (969) | 1011 |
| 2020-02-03 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1011.2620434327] expected: 0.46657316190658 vs jacelm (988) | 994 |
| 2020-02-10 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 994.19238461374] expected: 0.51554839407089 vs jacelm (1005) | 979 |
| 2020-02-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 978.689933224] expected: 0.56058986207121 vs jacelm (1021) | 997 |
| 2020-02-15 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 996.62880881028] expected: 0.50916785354884 vs jacelm (1003) | 981 |
| 2020-02-23 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 980.92218012385] expected: 0.55458003404427 vs jacelm (1019) | 967 |
| 2020-02-24 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 966.66874121326] expected: 0.59431522513599 vs jacelm (1033) | 986 |
| 2020-02-26 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 985.68682841761] expected: 0.54065597135729 vs jacelm (1014) | 971 |
| 2020-02-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 970.98781950105] expected: 0.58271893444289 vs jacelm (1029) | 958 |
| 2020-03-02 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 957.63482540322] expected: 0.61907996645868 vs jacelm (1042) | 977 |
| 2020-03-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 977.4453843299] expected: 0.56377006024203 vs jacelm (1022) | 979 |
| 2020-04-06 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 979.48602625764] expected: 0.57921802142011 vs jacelm (1035) | 998 |
| 2020-04-18 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 998.02100294309] expected: 0.52585078611543 vs jacelm (1016) | 983 |
| 2020-04-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 982.84822809878] expected: 0.56885567992673 vs jacelm (1031) | 969 |
| 2020-04-25 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 969.05160985643] expected: 0.60759023285238 vs jacelm (1045) | 956 |
| 2020-05-09 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 956.49449730771] expected: 0.64205914064042 vs jacelm (1058) | 945 |
| 2020-05-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 945.0403898082] expected: 0.68748829767669 vs jacelm (1082) | 935 |
| 2020-06-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 935.04001533386] expected: 0.71167526096653 vs jacelm (1092) | 926 |
| 2020-07-09 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 925.81362368479] expected: 0.77433550591961 vs jacelm (1140) | 951 |
| 2020-08-03 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 950.59235987422] expected: 0.73296682565404 vs jacelm (1126) | 958 |
| 2021-01-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 958.04729829514] expected: 0.76594586353971 vs jacelm (1164) | 951 |
| 2021-02-08 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 950.55756592842] expected: 0.78056614777617 vs jacelm (1171) | 944 |
| 2021-02-11 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 943.53568265725] expected: 0.79407814193262 vs jacelm (1178) | 937 |
| 2021-02-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 936.9461831991] expected: 0.81798375975399 vs jacelm (1198) | 931 |
| 2021-05-26 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 931.12166351122] expected: 0.67866420689091 vs jacelm (1061) | 921 |
| 2021-11-05 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 920.83891813173] expected: 0.6727138311829 vs jacelm (1046) | 910 |
| 2021-11-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 910.36576072959] expected: 0.68336090725641 vs jacelm (1044) | 932 |
| 2021-11-16 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 932.23330976179] expected: 0.62638482784673 vs jacelm (1022) | 920 |
| 2021-11-20 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 920.27762425289] expected: 0.65805500197928 vs jacelm (1034) | 909 |
| 2021-11-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 909.33538431622] expected: 0.68588445923004 vs jacelm (1045) | 899 |
| 2021-11-24 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 899.28368701158] expected: 0.71020402614196 vs jacelm (1055) | 922 |
| 2021-11-28 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 922.01021584813] expected: 0.65320384583883 vs jacelm (1032) | 911 |
| 2021-11-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 910.91273891497] expected: 0.68143088910572 vs jacelm (1043) | 901 |
| 2021-12-05 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 900.71852736635] expected: 0.70611770656363 vs jacelm (1053) | 891 |
| 2021-12-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 891.31429397639] expected: 0.74657076426829 vs jacelm (1079) | 883 |
| 2021-12-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 883.20455843297] expected: 0.74559991769249 vs jacelm (1070) | 907 |
| 2022-02-06 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 907.06375579913] expected: 0.68124214423494 vs jacelm (1039) | 929 |
| 2022-12-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 928.86350441465] expected: 0.54754318221327 vs jacelm (962) | 914 |
| 2023-01-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 914.38488624548] expected: 0.57373844347324 vs jacelm (966) | 901 |
| 2023-01-20 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 900.74451643662] expected: 0.61211974101021 vs jacelm (980) | 888 |
| 2024-10-27 | Rated: 888. expected: 0.46699369246547 vs Jacob Elmqvist (910.96853348732) | 905 |
| 2024-11-02 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.51595102277636 vs Jacob Elmqvist (893.91233164621) | 888 |
| 2024-11-11 | Rated: 888. expected: 0.46777577519096 vs Jacob Elmqvist (910.42276437506) | 873 |
| 2024-11-18 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.42516878419289 vs Jacob Elmqvist (925.39158918117) | 859 |
| 2024-11-23 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.3868672894332 vs Jacob Elmqvist (938.99699027534) | 847 |
| 2024-12-05 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.35415134770372 vs Jacob Elmqvist (951.3767435372) | 836 |
| 2024-12-10 | Rated: 836. expected: 0.32532662362556 vs Jacob Elmqvist (962.70958666372) | 826 |
| 2024-12-14 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.3000854435341 vs Jacob Elmqvist (973.12003861974) | 848 |
| 2024-12-20 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 848.39726580691] expected: 0.64350941218939 vs jacelm (951) | 837 |
| 2025-01-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.32697368317378 vs Jacob Elmqvist (962.40769880994) | 827 |
| 2025-01-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.30159793959204 vs Jacob Elmqvist (972.8708566715) | 849 |
| 2025-01-16 | Rated: 849. expected: 0.37819938293407 vs Jacob Elmqvist (935.37213311016) | 837 |
| 2025-01-19 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 836.89761974611] expected: 0.65335065694824 vs jacelm (947) | 826 |
| 2025-01-25 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.31856221561408 vs Jacob Elmqvist (958.09277897766) | 848 |
| 2025-01-26 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.37561100882372 vs Jacob Elmqvist (936.28676987731) | 836 |
| 2025-02-18 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 835.98044771764] expected: 0.66616445541663 vs jacelm (956) | 857 |
| 2025-03-08 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 857.29771029097] expected: 0.60999479399682 vs jacelm (935) | 845 |
| 2025-03-16 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 844.81754369887] expected: 0.6429542168486 vs jacelm (947) | 865 |
| 2025-09-22 | Rated: 865. expected: 0.38979638583565 vs Jacob Elmqvist (942.85478701459) | 885 |
| 2025-10-12 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.44506386021802 vs Jacob Elmqvist (923.32827136133) | 871 |
| 2025-10-22 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.40535302965152 vs Jacob Elmqvist (937.57031488831) | 858 |
| 2025-11-12 | Rated: 858. expected: 0.36327434035556 vs Jacob Elmqvist (955.48705166839) | 846 |
| 2025-11-20 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.33243869999697 vs Jacob Elmqvist (967.11183055977) | 835 |
| 2025-11-30 | Rated: 835. expected: 0.30539564004815 vs Jacob Elmqvist (977.74986895967) | 857 |
| 2025-12-07 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.36189672342494 vs Jacob Elmqvist (955.52252944121) | 845 |
Games logged: 21 Played Won Lost
Games won: 31
Attacking Win: 40% (40 attempts)
Defending Win: 33.33% (45 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
| Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 6 games lost (From 2020-04-18 to 2020-06-12 [55 days])