| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Ingemar Gardell (1000) | 968 |
| 2019-12-08 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.3691879343799 vs Ingemar Gardell (1061.060996942) | 1008 |
| 2019-12-10 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.48174714031061 vs Ingemar Gardell (1020.6890247424) | 977 |
| 2019-12-12 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.39437077276277 vs Ingemar Gardell (1051.5208417222) | 1016 |
| 2019-12-13 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.50466177773279 vs Ingemar Gardell (1012.7605711791) | 1048 |
| 2019-12-13 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.59516131414385 vs Ingemar Gardell (981.05892495396) | 1074 |
| 2019-12-14 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.66466651480552 vs Ingemar Gardell (955.14924905916) | 1031 |
| 2019-12-16 | Rated: 1031. expected: 0.54779359175652 vs Ingemar Gardell (997.68790600672) | 996 |
| 2019-12-17 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.44731356342622 vs Ingemar Gardell (1032.7466958791) | 967 |
| 2019-12-18 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.36742843127002 vs Ingemar Gardell (1061.3747639384) | 943 |
| 2019-12-21 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.30644642333597 vs Ingemar Gardell (1084.8901835397) | 987 |
| 2019-12-22 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.42360625968527 vs Ingemar Gardell (1040.5027546332) | 960 |
| 2019-12-27 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34990122322367 vs Ingemar Gardell (1067.6135552531) | 938 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.2942099937313 vs Ingemar Gardell (1090.0072335394) | 983 |
| 2019-12-30 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.41193776441851 vs Ingemar Gardell (1044.8366731382) | 957 |
| 2020-01-04 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.34132570199673 vs Ingemar Gardell (1071.200690061) | 999 |
| 2020-01-07 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.45686846475676 vs Ingemar Gardell (1029.0455349887) | 970 |
| 2020-01-11 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.37561324065048 vs ingemar gardell (1058.2851167332) | 1010 |
| 2020-01-19 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.48802256883549 vs Ingemar Gardell (1018.3243641348) | 979 |
| 2020-01-25 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.39983242277097 vs Ingemar Gardell (1049.5578085403) | 1017 |
| 2020-02-03 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.50842222708904 vs Ingemar Gardell (1011.1470835976) | 1048 |
| 2020-02-10 | Rated: 1048. expected: 0.59706395531044 vs Ingemar Gardell (979.68610613132) | 1074 |
| 2020-02-13 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.66626973963059 vs Ingemar Gardell (953.89819927119) | 1031 |
| 2020-02-15 | Rated: 1031. expected: 0.54943071047088 vs Ingemar Gardell (996.53946260755) | 1060 |
| 2020-02-23 | Rated: 1060. expected: 0.62978721634199 vs Ingemar Gardell (967.70302807768) | 1084 |
| 2020-02-24 | Rated: 1084. expected: 0.69122459131416 vs Ingemar Gardell (944.00940992357) | 1040 |
| 2020-02-26 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.57393144725657 vs Ingemar Gardell (988.24778376768) | 1067 |
| 2020-02-27 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.64801006644718 vs Ingemar Gardell (960.9793963921) | 1090 |
| 2020-03-02 | Rated: 1090. expected: 0.70524072251579 vs Ingemar Gardell (938.45204064472) | 1045 |
| 2020-03-14 | Rated: 1045. expected: 0.5874706841092 vs Ingemar Gardell (983.58744688573) | 1039 |
| 2020-03-23 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55589096111685 vs Andreas Freijd (1000) | 1067 |
| 2020-03-23 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.55589096111685 vs Andreas Freijd (1000) | 1067 |
| 2020-04-06 | Rated: 1067. expected: 0.61014835483292 vs Ingemar Gardell (989.18557066872) | 1028 |
| 2020-04-18 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.49966171377954 vs Ingemar Gardell (1028.235065378) | 1060 |
| 2020-04-22 | Rated: 1060. expected: 0.59077862441427 vs Ingemar Gardell (996.21341505991) | 1086 |
| 2020-04-25 | Rated: 1086. expected: 0.66096910417086 vs ingemar gardell (970.02324702243) | 1108 |
| 2020-05-09 | Rated: 1108. expected: 0.71487125212956 vs Ingemar Gardell (948.32526968936) | 1126 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.67377618788832 vs David Elmqvist (1000) | 1147 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.67377618788832 vs David Elmqvist (1000) | 1147 |
| 2020-05-27 | Rated: 1147. expected: 0.77707630178947 vs Ingemar Gardell (930.07702982566) | 1161 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 1161. expected: 0.80399101557623 vs Ingemar Gardell (915.80991314018) | 1174 |
| 2020-06-16 | Rated: 1174. expected: 0.75432426316405 vs David Elmqvist (979.12167602485) | 1190 |
| 2020-06-16 | Rated: 1174. expected: 0.75432426316405 vs David Elmqvist (979.12167602485) | 1190 |
| 2020-06-16 | Rated: 1190. expected: 0.7865785094188 vs David Elmqvist (963.39842886735) | 1204 |
| 2020-06-16 | Rated: 1190. expected: 0.7865785094188 vs David Elmqvist (963.39842886735) | 1204 |
| 2020-06-17 | Rated: 1204. expected: 0.81208897968233 vs David Elmqvist (949.73945347015) | 1216 |
| 2020-06-17 | Rated: 1204. expected: 0.81208897968233 vs David Elmqvist (949.73945347015) | 1216 |
| 2020-06-17 | Rated: 1216. expected: 0.83229045379382 vs David Elmqvist (937.71314816982) | 1227 |
| 2020-06-17 | Rated: 1216. expected: 0.83229045379382 vs David Elmqvist (937.71314816982) | 1227 |
| 2020-07-09 | Rated: 1227. expected: 0.86571211321203 vs Ingemar Gardell (903.26533813706) | 1172 |
| 2020-08-02 | Rated: 1172. expected: 0.72910996289775 vs Ulf Axelsson (1000) | 1189 |
| 2020-08-02 | Rated: 1172. expected: 0.72910996289775 vs Ulf Axelsson (1000) | 1189 |
| 2020-08-03 | Rated: 1189. expected: 0.79015845505083 vs Ingemar Gardell (958.67091338263) | 1170 |